Justifying electronic banking network expansion using real options analysis

被引:152
作者
Benaroch, M [1 ]
Kauffman, RJ
机构
[1] Syracuse Univ, Sch Management, Syracuse, NY 13244 USA
[2] Univ Minnesota, Carlson Sch Management, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
关键词
Black-Scholes model; investment decision making under uncertainty; electronic banking networks; POS debit systems; project investments; IT investment evaluation; option pricing models; real options;
D O I
10.2307/3250936
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The application of real options analysis to information technology investment evaluation problems recently has been proposed in the IS literature (Chalasani et al. 1997; Dos Santos 1991, Kambil et al. 1993; Kumar 1996; Taudes 1998). The research reported on in this paper illustrates the value of applying real options analysis in the context of a case study involving the deployment of point-of-sale (POS) debit services by the Yankee 24 shared electronic banking network of New England. in the course of so doing, the paper also attempts to operationalize real options analysis concepts by examining claimed strengths of this analysis approach and balancing them against methodological difficulties that this approach is believed to involve. The research employs a version of the Black-Scholes option pricing model that is adjusted for risk-averse investors, showing how it is possible to obtain reliable values for Yankee 24's "investment timing option, "even in the absence of a market to price it. To gather evidence for the existence of the timing option, basic scenario assumptions, and the parameters of the adjusted Black-Scholes model a structured interview format was developed. The results obtained using real options analysis enabled the network's senior management to identify conditions for which entry into the POS debit market would be profitable. These results also indicated that, in the absence of formal evaluation of the timing option, traditional approaches for evaluating information technology investments would have produced the wrong recommendations.
引用
收藏
页码:197 / 225
页数:29
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
Amram M, 1999, HARVARD BUS REV, V77, P95
[2]  
AXEL JJ, 1996, EVIDENCE MANGERS INT
[3]   A case for using real options pricing analysis to evaluate information technology project investments [J].
Benaroch, M ;
Kauffman, RJ .
INFORMATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 1999, 10 (01) :70-86
[4]   IRREVERSIBILITY, UNCERTAINTY, AND CYCLICAL INVESTMENT [J].
BERNANKE, BS .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1983, 98 (01) :85-106
[5]  
Brealey R., 1988, PRINCIPLES CORPORATE
[6]  
Busby JS, 1997, MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTIN, V8, P169
[7]  
CLEMONS EK, 1991, COMMUN ACM, V34, P22, DOI 10.1145/99977.99985
[8]  
COPELAND T.E., 1988, FINANCIAL THEORY COR, V3rd
[9]  
Cox John C., 1985, OPTIONS MARKETS
[10]  
Dixit K., 1994, INVESTMENT UNCERTAIN