Diagnosing major depressive disorder X - Can the utility of the DSM-IV symptom criteria be improved

被引:39
作者
Zimmerman, Mark [1 ]
Chelminski, Iwona [1 ]
McGlinchey, Joseph B. [1 ]
Young, Diane [1 ]
机构
[1] Brown Univ, Sch Med, Rhode Isl Hosp, Dept Psychiat & Human Behav, Providence, RI 02912 USA
关键词
major depressive disorder; diagnostic validity; clinical utility;
D O I
10.1097/01.nmd.0000248970.50265.34
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
There are two practical problems with the DSM-IV symptom criteria for major depressive disorder (MDD)-they are somewhat lengthy and therefore difficult to remember, and there are difficulties in applying some of the criteria in patients with comorbid medical illnesses because of symptom nonspecificity. Therefore, in the present report from the Rhode Island Methods to Improve Diagnostic Assessment and Services project, we attempted to develop a briefer definition of major depression that is composed entirely of mood and cognitive symptoms. Our goal was to develop an alternative set of diagnostic criteria for major depression that did not include somatic symptoms but would nonetheless demonstrate a high level of concordance with the current DSM-IV definition. We examined several alternative definitions of MDD. After eliminating the somatic criteria from the DSM-IV MDD criteria and adding the symptom "reduced drive," there was a very high level of concordance with DSM-IV classification (95%). This new definition thus offers two advantages over the current DSM-IV definition-it is briefer and it is free of somatic symptoms, thereby making it easier to apply with medically ill patients. We discuss using improvement in the clinical utility, rather than validity of diagnostic criteria, as the basis for making revisions in the nomenclature.
引用
收藏
页码:893 / 897
页数:5
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   Somatic symptoms for diagnosing major depression in cancer patients [J].
Akechi, T ;
Nakano, T ;
Akizuki, N ;
Okamura, M ;
Sakuma, K ;
Nakanishi, T ;
Yoshikawa, E ;
Uchitomi, Y .
PSYCHOSOMATICS, 2003, 44 (03) :244-248
[2]  
American Psychiatric Association (APA), 2013, DIAGN STAT MAN MENT, P5
[3]  
[Anonymous], DSM 4 SOURCEBOOK
[4]   RESPONSES TO PHENELZINE AND AMITRIPTYLINE ABSENCE OF DIFFERENTIAL PREDICTORS BY MULTIPLE-REGRESSION ANALYSIS [J].
BHAT, AV ;
ROWAN, PR ;
PAYKEL, ES .
JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 1984, 6 (02) :209-218
[5]   The efficacy of 2 different dosages of methylphenidate in treating adults with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder [J].
Bouffard, R ;
Hechtman, L ;
Minde, K ;
Iaboni-Kassab, F .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHIATRIE, 2003, 48 (08) :546-554
[6]  
BROCKINGTON IF, 1982, AM J PSYCHIAT, V139, P1022
[7]  
CARROLL BJ, 1984, J CLIN PSYCHIAT, V45, P14
[8]   DEPRESSION IN THE MEDICALLY ILL - CRITICAL ISSUES IN DIAGNOSTIC-ASSESSMENT [J].
CAVANAUGH, SV .
PSYCHOSOMATICS, 1995, 36 (01) :48-59
[9]  
CHOCHINOV HM, 1994, AM J PSYCHIAT, V151, P537
[10]  
ENDICOTT J, 1984, CANCER, V53, P2243