The cost of cancer registry operations: Impact of volume on cost per case for core and enhanced registry activities

被引:13
作者
Subramanian, Sujha [1 ]
Tangka, Florence K. L. [4 ]
Beebe, Maggie Cole [2 ]
Trebino, Diana [1 ,3 ]
Weir, Hannah K. [4 ]
Babcock, Frances [4 ]
机构
[1] RTI Int, Canc Econ & Policy, Waltham, MA USA
[2] RTI Int, Hlth Care Financing & Payment Program, Waltham, MA USA
[3] RTI Int, Waltham, MA USA
[4] Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Div Canc Prevent & Control, Atlanta, GA USA
关键词
Cost; Cancer registry; Economics; DRUG-ABUSE TREATMENT; PROGRAM; DATCAP;
D O I
10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2015.11.005
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
030301 [社会学];
摘要
Background: Cancer registration data is vital for creating evidence-based policies and interventions. Quantifying the resources needed for cancer registration activities and identifying potential efficiencies are critically important to ensure sustainability of cancer registry operations. Methods: Using a previously validated web-based cost assessment tool, we collected activity-based cost data and report findings using 3 years of data from 40 National Program of Cancer Registry grantees. We stratified registries by volume: low-volume included fewer than 10,000 cases, medium-volume included 10,000-50,000 cases, and high-volume included >50,000 cases. Results: Low-volume cancer registries incurred an average of $93.11 to report a case (without in-kind contributions) compared with $27.70 incurred by high-volume registries. Across all registries, the highest cost per case was incurred for data collection and abstraction ($8.33), management ($6.86), and administration ($4.99). Low- and medium-volume registries have higher costs than high-volume registries for all key activities. Conclusions: Some cost differences by volume can be explained by the large fixed costs required for administering and performing registration activities, but other reasons may include the quality of the data initially submitted to the registries from reporting sources such as hospitals and pathology laboratories. Automation or efficiency improvements in data collection can potentially reduce overall costs. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 8
页数:8
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]
Service-level costing of drug abuse treatment [J].
Anderson, DW ;
Bowland, BJ ;
Cartwright, WS ;
Bassin, G .
JOURNAL OF SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT, 1998, 15 (03) :201-211
[2]
[Anonymous], 2014, HLTH PEOPL 2020
[3]
[Anonymous], 2013, US CANC STAT 1999 20
[4]
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 2015, NAT PROGR CANC REG
[5]
Drummond MF, 2005, Methods for The Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes
[6]
A structured instrument for estimating the economic cost of drug abuse treatment - The Drug Abuse Treatment Cost Analysis Program (DATCAP) [J].
French, MT ;
Dunlap, LJ ;
Zarkin, GA ;
McGeary, KA ;
McLellan, AT .
JOURNAL OF SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT, 1997, 14 (05) :445-455
[7]
National Cancer Institute, 2015, SEER REG
[8]
North American Association of Central Cancer Registries, 2015, CERT CRIT
[9]
Estimating the client costs of addiction treatment:: first findings from the client drug abuse treatment cost analysis program (Client DATCAP) [J].
Salomé, HJ ;
French, MT ;
Miller, M ;
McLellan, AT .
DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE, 2003, 71 (02) :195-206
[10]
Subramanian S., 2007, J REGISTRY MANAGEMEN, V34, P75