Detection of donor-specific anti-HLA class I and II antibodies using antibody monitoring system

被引:20
作者
Yang, C. W. [1 ]
Oh, E. J. [1 ]
Lee, S. B. [1 ]
Moon, I. S. [1 ]
Kim, D. G. [1 ]
Choi, B. S. [1 ]
Park, S. C. [1 ]
Choi, Y. J. [1 ]
Park, Y. J. [1 ]
Han, K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Kangnam St Marys Hosp, Dept Lab Med, Seocho Ku, Seoul 137040, South Korea
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.transproceed.2006.09.007
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
The antibody monitoring system (AMS, GTI Inc) is a solid enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) crossmatch test for the detection of immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody to donor-specific solubilized HLA class I and class II antigens. The objective of this study was to compare the results of the AMS assay with donor-specific anti-HLA IgG antibodies (DS-HLA Abs), as determined by ELISA panel reactive antibody (PRA) and the flow cytometric crossmatch test (FCXM). A total of 107 sera were screened for the presence of HLA Abs by ELISA PRA (LAT-M, One-Lambda Inc), the DS-HLA Abs were determined in 34 serum samples (31.8%) by an ELISA panel (LAT class I and class II, One- Lambda Inc) and FCXM. The FCXM and AMS assays were performed with matched lymphocytes from 56 donors. There was a significant degree of concordance (89.7%) between the two tests (P <.001). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of AMS assay to detect DS-HLA Abs was 88.2%, 94.5%, 88.2%, and 94.5%, respectively. The AMS is a simple, objective test, which has several advantages over the cell-based crossmatch test, such as elimination of non-HLA antibody reactivity, elimination of non-donor-specific antibody reactivity, no need for viable cells, and preparation of the donor's HLA antigens in advance. In summary, this study suggested that AMS may be useful as a supportive crossmatch test or as a monitoring test after transplantation to detect class I or class II DS-HLA Abs.
引用
收藏
页码:2803 / 2806
页数:4
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   Prevalence and significance of anti-HLA and donor-specific antibodies long-term after renal transplantation [J].
Cardarelli, F ;
Pascual, M ;
Tolkoff-Rubin, N ;
Delmonico, FL ;
Wong, W ;
Schoenfeld, DA ;
Hui, Z ;
Cosimi, AB ;
Saidman, SL .
TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2005, 18 (05) :532-540
[2]   HLA antibody identification with single antigen beads compared to conventional methods [J].
El-Awar, N ;
Lee, J ;
Terasaki, PI .
HUMAN IMMUNOLOGY, 2005, 66 (09) :989-997
[3]   Relationship of donor-specific class-I anti-HLA antibodies detected by ELISA after kidney transplantation on the development of acute rejection and graft survival [J].
Fernández-Fresnedo, G ;
Pastor, JM ;
López-Hoyos, M ;
Ruiz, JC ;
Zubimendi, JA ;
Gonzalez-Cotorruelo, J ;
Rodrigo, E ;
De Francisco, ALM ;
Arias, M .
NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2003, 18 (05) :990-995
[4]   Sensitization and sensitivity - Defining the unsensitized patient [J].
Gebel, HM ;
Bray, RA .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2000, 69 (07) :1370-1374
[5]   Pre-transplant assessment of donor-reactive, HLA-specific antibodies in renal transplantation: Contraindication vs. risk [J].
Gebel, HM ;
Bray, RA ;
Nickerson, P .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2003, 3 (12) :1488-1500
[6]   The repercussions of implementing flow cytometry as a single HLA antibody screening technique in prospective renal transplant recipients [J].
Magee, B ;
Martin, J ;
Middleton, D .
TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2006, 19 (02) :105-109
[7]  
Moore SB, 1997, TRANSPLANTATION, V64, P1617
[8]   Single human leukocyte antigen flow cytometry beads for accurate identification of human leukocyte antigen antibody specificities [J].
Pei, R ;
Lee, JH ;
Shih, NJ ;
Chen, M ;
Terasaki, PI .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2003, 75 (01) :43-49
[9]  
Schönemann C, 1998, TRANSPLANTATION, V65, P1519
[10]   Prevalence of donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies during episodes of renal allograft rejection [J].
Supon, P ;
Constantino, D ;
Hao, P ;
Cagle, L ;
Hahn, A ;
Conti, DJ ;
Freed, BM .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2001, 71 (04) :577-580