RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF A PRESSURE ALGOMETER

被引:242
作者
Kinser, Ann M. [1 ]
Sands, William A. [1 ]
Stone, Michael H. [2 ]
机构
[1] US Olymp Training Ctr, Performance Serv, Colorado Springs, CO USA
[2] E Tennessee State Univ, Sports Performance Enhancement Consortium, Johnson City, TN 37614 USA
关键词
force application rate; intraexaminer reliability; pressure pain threshold; PAIN THRESHOLDS; MUSCLES;
D O I
10.1519/JSC.0b013e31818f051c
中图分类号
G8 [体育];
学科分类号
040301 [体育人文社会学];
摘要
Kinser, AM, Sands, WA, and Stone, MH. Reliability and validity of a pressure algometer. J Strength Cond Res 23(1): 312-314, 2009-Algometers are devices that can be used to identify the pressure and/or force eliciting a pressure-pain threshold. It has been noted in pressure-pain threshold studies that the rate at which manual force is applied should be consistent to provide the greatest reliability. This study tested the reliability and construct validity of an algometer (1000-Hz sampling rate) by manually applying pressure on a force plate (500-Hz sampling rate): 10 sets of 5 applications to 80 N and 1 set of 5 applications to each force level: 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 100, and 110 N. The investigator had previously become familiar with and practiced with the algometer. The handheld algometer had a 1-cm(2) round rubber application surface, and the maximum force reading was compared with maximum force readings by the force plate using SEM and t-tests. Force-time curves were analyzed for average slope representing rate of force application. Average Pearson (r) correlations between the maximum force reading of the algometer and force plate were excellent in both trials to 80 N (r = 0.990) and the incremental trials (r = 0.999). The application of force was reasonably constant, with slopes averaging 6.8 +/- 0.932 N.s(-1). The SEE was 0.323 N. In conclusion, with previous familiarization and practice, an investigator may have high reliability in the rate of force application. The device itself was also highly correlated with readings from a force plate and, therefore, may be considered valid.
引用
收藏
页码:312 / 314
页数:3
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]
Fischer A.A., 1990, Journal of Managed Care Medicine, V5, P145
[2]
FISCHER AA, 1988, ARCH PHYS MED REHAB, V69, P286
[4]
PRESSURE-PAIN THRESHOLD IN HUMAN TEMPORAL REGION - EVALUATION OF A NEW PRESSURE ALGOMETER [J].
JENSEN, K ;
ANDERSEN, HO ;
OLESEN, J ;
LINDBLOM, U .
PAIN, 1986, 25 (03) :313-323
[5]
KOSEK E, 1993, SCAND J REHABIL MED, V25, P117
[6]
CLINICAL INVESTIGATION OF REACTIONS TO PAIN [J].
MERSKEY, H ;
GILLIS, A ;
MARSZALEK, KS .
JOURNAL OF MENTAL SCIENCE, 1962, 108 (454) :347-&
[7]
Reliability of clinical pressure-pain algometric measurements obtained on consecutive days [J].
Nussbaum, EL ;
Downes, L .
PHYSICAL THERAPY, 1998, 78 (02) :160-169
[8]
PRESSURE PAIN THRESHOLDS, CLINICAL-ASSESSMENT, AND DIFFERENTIAL-DIAGNOSIS - RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY IN PATIENTS WITH MYOGENIC PAIN [J].
OHRBACH, R ;
GALE, EN .
PAIN, 1989, 39 (02) :157-169
[9]
Evaluation of repeatability of pressure algometry on the neck muscles for clinical use [J].
Ylinen, Jari ;
Nykanen, Matti ;
Kautiainen, Hannu ;
Hakkinen, Aria .
MANUAL THERAPY, 2007, 12 (02) :192-197