Intrathecal sufentanil for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy provides earlier discharge of the outpatient than intrathecal lidocaine

被引:25
作者
Lau, WC [1 ]
Green, CR [1 ]
Faerber, GJ [1 ]
Tait, AR [1 ]
Golembiewski, JA [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV MICHIGAN,MED CTR,DEPT SURG,DIV UROL,ANN ARBOR,MI 48109
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00000539-199706000-00010
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Many anesthetic techniques are currently used for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL). This randomized, prospective, double-blind study was designed to examine postoperative recovery with two anesthetic techniques for unilateral ESWL; i.e., intrathecal sufentanil versus intrathecal 5% lidocaine. The incidence of adverse effects was also assessed. Twenty-two ASA physical status I-III patients, 18-70 yr of age who were scheduled for unilateral ESWL under spinal anesthesia were studied. Patients were randomized to receive either intrathecal sufentanil 20 mu g + saline (n = Il)or intrathecal 5% lidocaine (n = Il)based on their height. Both patients and observers were blinded to the treatment groups. Patients were assessed for intraoperative and postoperative pain via a 10-cm verbal analog pain scale (VAPS) (0 = no pain, 10 = extreme pain). Stone sizes, number of shock waves, and voltages were also compared. The recovery profile-time to ambulate, void, oral intake, and home discharge-was documented. Antiemetic requirements in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) and incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), pruritus, and sedation were also recorded. This study showed no differences in VAPS between groups at any time in the perioperative period. Patients who received intrathecal sufentanil ambulated (79 +/- 16 vs 146 +/- 57 min mean +/- so; P < 0.05), voided (80 +/- 18 vs 152 +/- 54 min, P < 0.05), and were discharged home (98 +/- 17 vs 166 +/- 50 min, P < 0.005) significantly sooner than the patients who received intrathecal lidocaine. Although 27% (3 of 11) of the patients who received sufentanil reported pruritus, respiratory depression was not found. There were no differences in PONV between the two groups. Intrathecal sufentanil provided an enhanced recovery profile with significantly earlier home discharge when compared with intrathecal lidocaine. In conclusion, intrathecal sufentanil is a safe and effective method of anesthesia for outpatient unilateral ESWL.
引用
收藏
页码:1227 / 1231
页数:5
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   ANESTHESIA FOR EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCK-WAVE LITHOTRIPSY [J].
ABBOTT, MA ;
SAMUEL, JR ;
WEBB, DR .
ANAESTHESIA, 1985, 40 (11) :1065-1072
[2]   COMPARISON OF SEDATIVE RECOVERY-TIME AFTER MIDAZOLAM VERSUS DIAZEPAM ADMINISTRATION [J].
ARIANO, RE ;
KASSUM, DA ;
ARONSON, KJ .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1994, 22 (09) :1492-1496
[3]   RESPIRATORY ARREST AFTER 2ND DOSE OF INTRATHECAL SUFENTANIL [J].
BAKER, MN ;
SARNA, MC .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1995, 83 (01) :231-232
[4]   INTRATHECAL SUFENTANIL FOR LABOR ANALGESIA - EFFECTS OF ADDED EPINEPHRINE [J].
CAMANN, WR ;
MINZTER, BH ;
DENNEY, RA ;
DATTA, S .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1993, 78 (05) :870-874
[5]   THE ADDITION OF BUPIVACAINE TO INTRATHECAL SUFENTANIL FOR LABOR ANALGESIA [J].
CAMPBELL, DC ;
CAMANN, WR ;
DATTA, S .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1995, 81 (02) :305-309
[6]   INTRATHECAL SUFENTANIL COMPARED TO EPIDURAL BUPIVACAINE FOR LABOR ANALGESIA [J].
DANGELO, R ;
ANDERSON, MT ;
PHILIP, J ;
EISENACH, JC .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1994, 80 (06) :1209-1215
[7]  
DUVALL JO, 1985, ANESTH ANALG, V64, P544
[8]   RESPIRATORY DEPRESSION AFTER INTRATHECAL SUFENTANIL DURING LABOR [J].
HAYS, RL ;
PALMER, CM .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1994, 81 (02) :511-512
[9]  
HONET JE, 1992, ANESTH ANALG, V75, P734
[10]  
JAYARAM A, 1993, ANESTH ANALG, V76, P745