A delusion assessment scale for psychotic major depression: Reliability, validity, and utility

被引:34
作者
Meyers, Barnett S.
English, Judith
Gabriele, Michelle
Peasley-Miklus, Catherine
Heo, Moonseong
Flint, Alastair J.
Mulsant, Benoit H.
Rothschild, Anthony J.
机构
[1] Cornell Univ, Weill Coll Med, Dept Psychiat, White Plains, NY 10605 USA
[2] New York Presbyterian Hosp, Westchester Div, W Chester, NY USA
[3] Univ Toronto, Univ Hlth Network, Dept Psychiat, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Toronto Rehabil Inst, Geriatr Program & Res Inst, Toronto, ON, Canada
[5] VA Pittsburgh Hlth Syst, Geriatr Res Educ & Clin Ctr, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[6] Univ Massachusetts, Sch Med, Dept Psychiat, Worcester, MA 01655 USA
[7] Univ Massachusetts Mem Hlth Care, Worcester, MA USA
关键词
delusions; depression; impact; conviction; bizarreness; disorganization;
D O I
10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.05.033
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Background: Although delusions are the hallmark of major depression with psychotic features, a scale to measure the intensify of beliefs across multiple delusional domains in this condition has been unavailable. The development and assessment of the Delusional Assessment Scale (DAS) are described. Methods: Scale items were selected initially based on previous studies of delusional ideation in schizophrenia. A three-point item to assess mood congruence was added. A 15-item scale was assessed in 92 subjects participating in the four-site collaborative study of the pharmacotherapy of major depression with psychotic features. Maximum likelihood method was used to determine scale factors, The internal consistency of these factors was determined. Comparisons between scale scores and ratings from the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) (Overall and Gorham 1962) were used to assess convergent and discriminant validity. Results: The data were fit by a five-factor model (impact, conviction, disorganization, bizarreness, and extension). Inter-rater reliability of the five factors ranged from. 77 for conviction and .74 for impact to .37 for disorganization. Internal consistency for each of the five factors was >= .72. Scores on specific domains were signficantly correlated with the BPRS unusual thought content item and positive symptom subscale scores. Conclusions: The DAS is a reliable measure of 5 delusional domains.
引用
收藏
页码:1336 / 1342
页数:7
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
Andreasen N.C., 1983, SCALE ASSESSMENT POS
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1998, STRUCTURED CLIN INTE
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1979, Schedule for affective disorders and schizophrenia
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2000, Using Multivariate Statistics
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2000, DIAGN STAT MAN MENT
[6]  
ANTON RF, 1990, AM J PSYCHIAT, V147, P1203
[7]   ACTING ON DELUSIONS .2. THE PHENOMENOLOGICAL CORRELATES OF ACTING ON DELUSIONS [J].
BUCHANAN, A ;
REED, A ;
WESSELY, S ;
GARETY, P ;
TAYLOR, P ;
GRUBIN, D ;
DUNN, G .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 1993, 163 :77-81
[8]   WHAT IS COEFFICIENT ALPHA - AN EXAMINATION OF THEORY AND APPLICATIONS [J].
CORTINA, JM .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1993, 78 (01) :98-104
[9]  
Cronbach LJ, 1951, PSYCHOMETRIKA, V16, P297
[10]  
Fleiss J., 1986, Reliability of measurement: the design and analysis of clinical experiments