Optimization of mobile IPv6-based handovers to support VoIP services in wireless heterogeneous networks

被引:35
作者
Fathi, Hanane
Chakraborty, Shyam S.
Prasad, Ramjee
机构
[1] Aalborg Univ, Ctr TeleInFrastuktur, DK-9220 Aalborg, Denmark
[2] Aalto Univ, Espoo 02015, Finland
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
fast mobile IPv6 (FMIPv6); handover delay; hierarchical mobile IPv6 (HMIPv6); Internet Protocol (IP)-based wireless networks; mobile IPv6 (MIPv6); voice over IP (VoIP);
D O I
10.1109/TVT.2006.883806
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
The support of voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) services in next-generation wireless systems requires the coupling of mobility with quality of service. The mobile node can experience disruptions or even intermittent disconnections of an ongoing real-time session due to handovers. The duration of such interruptions is called disruption time or handover delay and can heavily affect-user satisfaction. Therefore, this delay needs to be minimized to provide good-quality VoIP services. In this paper, the focus is on the network layer mobility, specifically on mobile Internet Protocols (MIPs), since they are natural candidates for providing mobility at layer 3. Using analytical models, the authors evaluate MIPv4, MIPv6, fast MIPv6 (FMIPv6), and hierarchical MIPv6 (HMIPv6) and compare their performances in terms of handover delay for VoIP services. To optimize the handover delay, the authors propose to use the adaptive retransmission timer described in this paper. The results obtained using the adaptive timer technique show that for a 3% frame error rate and a 128-kb/s channel, the handoff delay is about 0.075 s (predictive) and 0.051 s (reactive) for FMIPv6. It is around 0.047 s [intra-mobile anchor point (MAP)] and 1.47 s (inter-MAP) for HMIPv6, around 1 s for MIPv6, and 0.26 s for MIPv4.
引用
收藏
页码:260 / 270
页数:11
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
Banerjee N, 2003, P INT PAR DISTR PROC, P224
[2]   Comparison of IP micromobility protocols [J].
Campbell, AT ;
Gomez, J ;
Kim, S ;
Wan, CY ;
Turanyi, ZR ;
Valko, AG .
IEEE WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS, 2002, 9 (01) :72-82
[3]  
*ETSI, 2005, TS 122 105 REL 6
[4]  
FLARION HS, 2004, HIERARCHICAL MOBILE
[5]  
GWON Y, 2004, P IEEE INT C COMM IC, V7, P4087
[6]  
Hartenstein H., 2003, ACM SIGMOBILE Mobile Computing and Communications Review, V7, P5, DOI 10.1145/965732.965736
[7]  
Johnson D. B., 2004, 3775 IETF RFC
[8]   Performance evaluation of two layered mobility management using mobile IP and session initiation protocol [J].
Jung, JW ;
Mudumbai, R ;
Montgomery, D ;
Kahng, HK .
GLOBECOM'03: IEEE GLOBAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-7, 2003, :1190-1194
[9]  
Koodli R, 2005, 4068 IETF RFC
[10]   Mobility management for VoIP service: Mobile IP vs. SIP [J].
Kwon, TT ;
Gerla, M ;
Das, S ;
Das, S .
IEEE WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS, 2002, 9 (05) :66-75