Prognostic factors for medulloblastoma

被引:57
作者
Jenkin, D
Al Shabanah, M
Al Shail, E
Gray, A
Hassounah, M
Khafaga, Y
Kofide, A
Mustafa, M
Schultz, H
机构
[1] King Faisal Specialist Hosp & Res Ctr, Sect Radiat Oncol, Dept Oncol, Riyadh 11211, Saudi Arabia
[2] King Faisal Specialist Hosp & Res Ctr, Dept Neurosci, Neurosurg Sect, Riyadh 11211, Saudi Arabia
[3] King Faisal Specialist Hosp & Res Ctr, Dept Oncol, Sect Pediat Haematol Oncol, Riyadh 11211, Saudi Arabia
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 2000年 / 47卷 / 03期
关键词
medulloblastoma; prognostic factors; treatment;
D O I
10.1016/S0360-3016(00)00431-4
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate prognostic factors for medulloblastoma. Methods and Materials: One hundred and seventy-three consecutive patients with medulloblastoma, treated at King Faisal Specialist Hospital (KFSH) from 1988-1997, were reviewed. Eighty-four percent were children less than 15 years old. From 1988-1994, treatment was at the discretion of the investigator. From 1994-1998, patients entered a single-arm best practice protocol in which, in staged patients, the surgical intent was total resection, standard radiation treatment was defined, and adjuvant chemotherapy was given to a "high-risk" subset. Results: For 150 patients who completed surgical and radiation treatment, the 5-year survival rate was 58%, compared with 0% for 16 patients who were unable to start or complete radiation treatment. For staged patients, the 5-year survival was M0 + M1, 78% and M2 + M3, 21% (p < 0.0001). Other favorable significant prognostic factors were age >14 Sears and gross cystic/necrotic features in the primary tumor. The size of the primary tumor, the degree of hydrocephalus at diagnosis, the presence of residual tumor in the post-operative CT/MRI, and the functional status of the patient prior to radiation treatment were not significant factors. Conclusions: Stage M0 + M1 was the most powerful favorable prognostic factor. In Saudi Arabia more patients present with advanced disseminated disease, 41% M2 + M3, than in the West, and this impacts adversely on overall survival. Total resection and standard radiation treatment were not sensitive prognostic factors in a treatment environment in which 78% of patients underwent at least 90% tumor resection and 60% received standard radiation treatment. In order to improve the proportion of patients able to complete radiation treatment, consideration should be given to limiting resection when the attainment of total resection is likely to be morbid, and to delaying rather than omitting radiation treatment in the patient severely compromised postoperatively. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:573 / 584
页数:12
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
ALBRIGHT AL, 1989, PEDIATR NEUROSCI, V15, P276
[2]  
Ayan I, 1997, INT J RADIAT ONCOL, V39, P461
[3]   PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF CHEMOTHERAPY GIVEN BEFORE RADIOTHERAPY IN CHILDHOOD MEDULLOBLASTOMA - INTERNATIONAL-SOCIETY-OF-PEDIATRIC-ONCOLOGY (SIOP) AND THE (GERMAN)-SOCIETY-OF-PEDIATRIC-ONCOLOGY (GPO) - SIOP-II [J].
BAILEY, CC ;
GNEKOW, A ;
WELLEK, S ;
JONES, M ;
ROUND, C ;
BROWN, J ;
PHILLIPS, A ;
NEIDHARDT, MK .
MEDICAL AND PEDIATRIC ONCOLOGY, 1995, 25 (03) :166-178
[4]   RADIATION TREATMENT FOR MEDULLOBLASTOMA - A 21-YEAR REVIEW [J].
BERRY, MP ;
DEREK, R ;
JENKIN, T ;
KEEN, CW ;
NAIR, BD ;
SIMPSON, WJ .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 1981, 55 (01) :43-51
[5]   MEDULLOBLASTOMA IN ADULTS - A REVIEW OF 47 PATIENTS TREATED BETWEEN 1952 AND 1981 [J].
BLOOM, HJG ;
BESSELL, EM .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1990, 18 (04) :763-772
[6]  
CARRIE C, 1994, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V74, P2352, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19941015)74:8<2352::AID-CNCR2820740821>3.0.CO
[7]  
2-H
[8]   AN OPERATIVE STAGING SYSTEM AND A MEGAVOLTAGE RADIOTHERAPEUTIC TECHNIC FOR CEREBELLAR MEDULLOBLASTOMAS [J].
CHANG, CH ;
HOUSEPIAN, EM ;
HERBERT, C .
RADIOLOGY, 1969, 93 (06) :1351-+
[9]  
Danjoux CE, 1996, MED PEDIATR ONCOL, V26, P1, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1096-911X(199601)26:1<1::AID-MPO1>3.0.CO
[10]  
2-Q