Misleading funnel plot for detection of bias in meta-analysis

被引:286
作者
Tang, JL [1 ]
Liu, JLY
机构
[1] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Fac Med, Dept Community & Family Med, Shatin, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Fac Med, Ctr Clin Trials & Epidemiol Res, Shatin, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
funnel plot; meta-analysis; randomized controlled trials; selection bias; publication bias; statistical method; systematic reviews;
D O I
10.1016/S0895-4356(99)00204-8
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Publication and other forms of selection biases pose a threat to the validity of meta-analysis. Funnel plots are usually used to detect such biases; asymmetrical plots are interpreted to suggest that biases are present. Using 198 published meta-analyses, we demonstrate that the shape of a funnel plot is largely determined by the arbitrary choice of the method to construct the plot. When a different definition of precision and/or effect measure were used, the conclusion about the shape of the plot was altered in 37 (86%) of the 43 meta-analyses with an asymmetrical plot suggesting selection bias. In the absence of a consensus on how the plot should be constructed, asymmetrical funnel plots should be interpreted cautiously. These findings also suggest that the discrepancies between large trials and corresponding meta-analyses and heterogeneity in meta-analyses may also be determined by how they are evaluated. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:477 / 484
页数:8
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   INVITED COMMENTARY - BENEFITS OF HETEROGENEITY IN METAANALYSIS OF DATA FROM EPIDEMIOLOGIC STUDIES [J].
BERLIN, JA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1995, 142 (04) :383-387
[2]  
BERLIN JA, 1989, J AM STAT ASSOC, V84, P381
[3]  
BOULVAIN M, 1998, STRIPPING SWEEPING M
[4]   Large trials vs meta-analysis of smaller trials - How do their results compare? [J].
Cappelleri, JC ;
Ioannidis, JPA ;
Schmid, CH ;
deFerranti, SD ;
Aubert, M ;
Chalmers, TC ;
Lau, J .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1996, 276 (16) :1332-1338
[5]  
DAVEYSMITH G, 1994, BRIT MED J, V308, P72
[6]  
DAVEYSMITH G, 1993, BRIT MED J, V306, P1367
[7]   METAANALYSIS IN CLINICAL-TRIALS [J].
DERSIMONIAN, R ;
LAIRD, N .
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1986, 7 (03) :177-188
[8]   FACTORS INFLUENCING PUBLICATION OF RESEARCH RESULTS - FOLLOW-UP OF APPLICATIONS SUBMITTED TO 2 INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARDS [J].
DICKERSIN, K ;
MIN, YI ;
MEINERT, CL .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1992, 267 (03) :374-378
[9]   PUBLICATION BIAS IN CLINICAL RESEARCH [J].
EASTERBROOK, PJ ;
BERLIN, JA ;
GOPALAN, R ;
MATTHEWS, DR .
LANCET, 1991, 337 (8746) :867-872
[10]   Meta-analysis - Bias in location and selection of studies [J].
Egger, M ;
Smith, GD .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1998, 316 (7124) :61-66