A contingency model for estimating success of strategic information systems planning

被引:39
作者
Bechor, Tamir [2 ]
Neumann, Seev [3 ]
Zviran, Moshe [3 ]
Glezer, Chanan [1 ]
机构
[1] Ariel Univ, Ctr Samaria, Fac Engn, Dept Ind Engn & Management, Ariel, Israel
[2] Claremont Grad Univ, Sch Informat Syst & Technol, Claremont, CA USA
[3] Tel Aviv Univ, Fac Management, Management Technol & Informat Syst Dept, IL-69978 Tel Aviv, Israel
关键词
Strategic information systems planning (SISP); Key success factors; Planning approach; Planning context; Contingency theory; IS planning paradox; BUSINESS; MANAGEMENT; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.im.2009.09.004
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Strategic information system planning (SISP) has been identified as a critical management issue. It is considered by many as the best mechanism for assuring that IT activities are congruent with those of the rest of the organization and its evolving needs. Our research investigated the success of SISP as a function of its key Success factors (KSFs) in different contexts and SISP approaches, in a framework that integrated all of the SISP components and provided a new perspective on how the constructs are instrumental to produce SISP success. Based on responses from 172 American CIOs, our study's findings empirically supported our research model: the combination of SISP context and approach was found to have a moderating influence on the basic relationship between SISP KSFs and its success, the best predictor for the long-term success of the SISP process was apparently based on the three-way interactions between SISP's KSFs, its approach and its context. In addition, specific combinations of SISP approach and SISP context were found to decrease or increase the size of the "planning paradox" (the inconsistency in the behavior of the "basic relationship" between the three). (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:17 / 29
页数:13
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   The impact of organizational commitment, senior management involvement, and team involvement on strategic information systems planning [J].
Basu, V ;
Hartono, E ;
Lederer, AL ;
Sethi, V .
INFORMATION & MANAGEMENT, 2002, 39 (06) :513-524
[2]  
BROWN I, 2008, P 2008 ANN RES C S A, V338, P8
[3]   Environmental assessment in strategic information systems planning [J].
Chi, L ;
Jones, KG ;
Lederer, AL ;
Li, PT ;
Newkirk, HE ;
Sethi, V .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, 2005, 25 (03) :253-269
[4]   Contextual determinants and performance implications of information systems strategy planning within South African firms [J].
Cohen, Jason F. .
INFORMATION & MANAGEMENT, 2008, 45 (08) :547-555
[5]  
CUNNINGHAM N, 2001, ORG DEV J, V19, P93
[6]  
Garg Adarsh, 2008, International Journal of Business Information Systems, V3, P410, DOI 10.1504/IJBIS.2008.018041
[7]   An empirical evaluation of stages of strategic information systems planning: patterns of process design and effectiveness [J].
Grover, V ;
Segars, AH .
INFORMATION & MANAGEMENT, 2005, 42 (05) :761-779
[8]   The effect of top management support of SISP on strategic IS management: insights from the US electric power industry [J].
Kearns, GS .
OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2006, 34 (03) :236-253
[9]   Assessing the impact of proactive versus reactive modes of strategic information systems planning [J].
King, WR ;
Teo, TSH .
OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2000, 28 (06) :667-679
[10]   Competitive advantage from mandatory investments: An empirical study of Australian firms [J].
Krell, Katharina ;
Matook, Sabine .
JOURNAL OF STRATEGIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2009, 18 (01) :31-45