Reviewing optimisation criteria for energy systems analyses of renewable energy integration

被引:200
作者
Ostergaard, Poul Alberg [1 ]
机构
[1] Aalborg Univ, Dept Dev & Planning, DK-9220 Aalborg, Denmark
关键词
Renewable energy integration; Optimisation criteria; Energy systems analyses; Energy cities; Energy islands; WIND POWER; STORAGE; CHP; MANAGEMENT; DENMARK; PLANTS; AIR;
D O I
10.1016/j.energy.2009.05.004
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
The utilisation of fluctuating renewable energy sources is increasing world-wide; however, so is the concern about how to integrate these resources into the energy systems. The design of optimal energy resource mixes in climate change mitigation actions is a challenge faced in many places. This optimisation may be implemented according to economic objectives or with a focus on techno-operational aims and within these two main groupings, several different criteria may potentially be applied to the design process. In this article, a series of optimisation criteria are reviewed and subsequently applied to an energy system model of Western Denmark in an analysis of how to use heat pumps for the integration of wind power. The analyses demonstrate that the fact whether the system in question is modelled as operated in island mode or not has a large impact on the definition of the optimal wind power level. If energy savings and CO2 emission reductions beyond the system boundary are not included in the analysis, then it is either not feasible to expand wind power to a high degree or it is conversely more feasible to install relocation technologies that can utilise any excess production. The analyses also demonstrate that different optimisation criteria render different optimal designs. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1236 / 1245
页数:10
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]   The potential contribution of renewable energy to electricity supply in Saudi Arabia [J].
Alnatheer, O .
ENERGY POLICY, 2005, 33 (18) :2298-2312
[2]   New CHP partnerships offering balancing of fluctuating renewable electricity productions [J].
Andersen, Anders N. ;
Lund, Henrik .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2007, 15 (03) :288-293
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1997, The Kyoto Protocol
[4]  
Ayres M., 2004, Levelised Unit Electricity Cost Comparison of Alternate Technologies for Baseload Generation in Ontario
[5]   Energy, economic and environmental analysis on RET-hydrogen systems in residential buildings [J].
Beccali, M. ;
Brunone, S. ;
Cellura, M. ;
Franzitta, V. .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2008, 33 (03) :366-382
[6]  
Belton Valerie., 2002, Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: An Integrated Approach, DOI [10.1007/978-1-4615-1495-4, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4615-1495-4]
[7]   Solar collector systems to provide hot air in rural applications [J].
Bilgen, E. ;
Bakeka, B. J. D. .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2008, 33 (07) :1461-1468
[8]   The effectiveness of storage and relocation options in renewable energy systems [J].
Blarke, M. B. ;
Lund, H. .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2008, 33 (07) :1499-1507
[9]   A multicriteria approach to evaluate wind energy plants on an Italian island [J].
Cavallaro, F ;
Ciraolo, L .
ENERGY POLICY, 2005, 33 (02) :235-244
[10]   Optimal wind-thermal coordination dispatch in isolated power systems with large integration of wind capacity [J].
Chen, Chun-Lung ;
Lee, Tsung-Ying ;
Jan, Rong-Mow .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2006, 47 (18-19) :3456-3472