Early adolescent outcomes of institutionally-deprived and non-deprived adoptees. II: Language as a protective factor and a vulnerable outcome

被引:83
作者
Croft, Carla
Beckett, Celia
Rutter, Michael
Castle, Jenny
Colvert, Emma
Groothues, Christine
Hawkins, Amanda
Kreppner, Jana
Stevens, Suzanne E.
Sonuga-Barke, Edmund J. S.
机构
[1] Kings Coll London, MRC SGDP Ctr, Inst Psychiat, London SE5 8AF, England
[2] Univ Southampton, Dev Brain Behav Unit, Sch Psychol, Southampton SO9 5NH, Hants, England
[3] Hillingdon Hosp, Dept Hlth Psychol, Uxbridge, Middx, England
关键词
language; cognition; institutional deprivation; sensitive period; longitudinal study; resilience; intelligence; adoption;
D O I
10.1111/j.1469-7610.2006.01689.x
中图分类号
B844 [发展心理学(人类心理学)];
学科分类号
040202 ;
摘要
Background: There is uncertainty about the extent to which language skills are part of general intelligence and even more uncertainty on whether deprivation has differential effects on language and non-language skills.Methods: Language and cognitive outcomes at 6 and 11 years of age were compared between a sample of 132 institution-reared Romanian children adopted into UK families under the age of 42 months, and a sample of 49 children adopted within the UK under the age of 6 months who had not experienced either institutional rearing or profound deprivation. Results: The effects of institutional deprivation were basically similar for language and cognitive outcomes at age 6; in both there were few negative effects of deprivation if it ended before the age of 6 months and there was no linear association with duration of deprivation within the 6 to 42 month range. For the children over 18 months on arrival (range 18-42 months), the presence of even very minimal language skills (imitation of speech sounds) at the time of arrival was a strong beneficial prognostic factor for language and cognitive outcomes, but not for social/emotional/behavioural outcomes. Individual variations in adoptive parent characteristics were unrelated to differences in language or cognitive outcomes, possibly as a consequence of the limited variability in the adoptive family group.Conclusions: Minimal language probably indexes some form of cognitive reserve that, in turn, indexes the degree of institutional deprivation.
引用
收藏
页码:31 / 44
页数:14
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1993, LANGUAGE DEV EXCEPTI
[2]  
[Anonymous], ADOPTION FOSTERING
[3]   Do the effects of early severe deprivation on cognition persist into early adolescence? Findings from the English and Romanian adoptees study [J].
Beckett, C ;
Maughan, B ;
Rutter, M ;
Castle, J ;
Colvert, E ;
Groothues, C ;
Kreppner, J ;
Stevens, S ;
O'Connor, TG ;
Sonuga-Barke, EJS .
CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 2006, 77 (03) :696-711
[4]  
BISHOP D, 1993, LANGUAGE DEV EXCEPTI, P203
[5]  
Bishop D. V. M., 1989, TROG-2 test for reception of grammar-2
[6]   Non-verbal cognitive development and language impairment [J].
Botting, N .
JOURNAL OF CHILD PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY, 2005, 46 (03) :317-326
[7]  
BRIMER MA, 1986, ENGLISH PICTURE VOCA
[8]   Effects of qualities of early institutional care on cognitive attainment [J].
Castle, J ;
Groothues, C ;
Bredenkamp, D ;
Beckett, C ;
O'Connor, T ;
Rutter, M .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPSYCHIATRY, 1999, 69 (04) :424-437
[9]   Developmental language disorders a follow-up in later adult life. Cognitive, language and psychosocial outcomes [J].
Clegg, J ;
Hollis, C ;
Mawhood, L ;
Rutter, M .
JOURNAL OF CHILD PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY, 2005, 46 (02) :128-149
[10]  
Dennis W., 1973, Children of the Creche