Integrating human impacts and ecological integrity into a risk-based protocol for conservation planning

被引:50
作者
Mattson, Kimberly M. [1 ]
Angermeier, Paul L.
机构
[1] Virginia Polytech Inst & State Univ, Dept Fisheries & Wildlife Sci, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA
[2] Virginia Polytech Inst & State Univ, Virginia Cooperat Fish & Wildlife Res Unit, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA
关键词
freshwater conservation; conservation planning; ecological integrity; biotic driver; impact assessment; human disturbance; land use; ecological risk;
D O I
10.1007/s00267-005-0238-7
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Conservation planning aims to protect biodiversity by sustainng the natural physical, chemical, and biological processes within representative ecosystems. Often data to measure these components are inadequate or unavailable. The impact of human activities on ecosystem processes complicates integrity assessments and might alter ecosystem organization at multiple spatial scales. Freshwater conservation targets, such as populations and communities, are influenced by both intrinsic aquatic properties and the surrounding landscape, and locally collected data might not accurately reflect potential impacts. We suggest that changes in five major biotic drivers-energy sources, physical habitat, flow regime, water quality, and biotic interactions-might be used as surrogates to inform conservation planners of the ecological integrity of freshwater ecosystems. Threats to freshwater systems might be evaluated based on their impact to these drivers to provide an overview of potential risk to conservation targets. We developed a risk-based protocol, the Ecological Risk Index (ERI), to identify watersheds with least/most risk to conservation targets. Our protocol combines risk-based components, specifically the frequency and severity of human-induced stressors, with biotic drivers and mappable land- and water-use data to provide a summary of relative risk to watersheds. We illustrate application of our protocol with a case study of the upper Tennessee River basin, USA. Differences in risk patterns among the major drainages in the basin reflect dominant land uses, such as mining and agriculture. A principal components analysis showed that localized, moderately severe threats accounted for most of the threat composition differences among our watersheds. We also found that the relative importance of threats is sensitive to the spatial grain of the analysis. Our case study demonstrates that the ERI is useful for evaluating the frequency and severity of ecosystemwide risk, which can inform local and regional conservation planning.
引用
收藏
页码:125 / 138
页数:14
相关论文
共 73 条
[1]  
Abell R.A., 2000, FRESHWATER ECOREGION
[2]   The influence of catchment land use on stream integrity across multiple spatial scales [J].
Allan, JD ;
Erickson, DL ;
Fay, J .
FRESHWATER BIOLOGY, 1997, 37 (01) :149-161
[3]  
Baron JS, 2002, ECOL APPL, V12, P1247
[4]   Measuring and mapping threats to a wildlife sanctuary in southern India [J].
Barve, N ;
Kiran, MC ;
Vanaraj, G ;
Aravind, NA ;
Rao, D ;
Shaanker, RU ;
Ganeshaiah, KN ;
Poulsen, JG .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2005, 19 (01) :122-130
[5]   Cumulative impacts of landuse on water quality in a southern Appalachian watershed [J].
Bolstad, PV ;
Swank, WT .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION, 1997, 33 (03) :519-533
[6]   Assessing relative risks to aquatic ecosystems: A mid-Appalachian case study [J].
Bryce, SA ;
Larsen, DP ;
Hughes, RM ;
Kaufmann, PR .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION, 1999, 35 (01) :23-36
[7]   A system dynamic model for the assessment of different exposure routes in aquatic ecosystems [J].
Carbonell, G ;
Ramos, C ;
Pablos, MV ;
Ortiz, JA ;
Tarazona, JV .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2000, 247 (2-3) :107-118
[8]  
Carpenter SR, 1998, ECOL APPL, V8, P559, DOI 10.1890/1051-0761(1998)008[0559:NPOSWW]2.0.CO
[9]  
2
[10]   Determining the causes of impairments in the Little Scioto River, Ohio, USA: Part 2. Characterization of causes [J].
Cormier, SM ;
Norton, SB ;
Suter, GW ;
Altfater, D ;
Counts, B .
ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY, 2002, 21 (06) :1125-1137