Respiratory sensitization to diphenyl-methane-4,4′-diisocyanate (MDI) in guinea pigs:: impact of particle size on induction and elicitation of response

被引:24
作者
Pauluhn, J
Thiel, A
Emura, M
Mohr, U
机构
[1] Bayer AG, Inst Toxicol, D-42096 Wuppertal, Germany
[2] Hannover Med Sch, Inst Expt Pathol, D-30625 Hannover, Germany
关键词
respiratory sensitization; allergy; airway hypersensitivity; respiratory rate; airway eosinophils; confounding factors;
D O I
10.1093/toxsci/56.1.105
中图分类号
R99 [毒物学(毒理学)];
学科分类号
100405 ;
摘要
The impact of particle size of aerosolized polymeric diphenyl-methane-4,4'-diisocyanate (MDI) for the induction and elicitation of respiratory sensitization was evaluated. Four groups of 16 female guinea pigs each received either the vehicle, repeated intradermal (id) injections (3 x 0.3% MDI), one high-level inhalation exposure of 15 min to 135 mg MDI/m(3) air using a small aerosol (MMAD approximate to 1.7 mu m) or large aerosol (MMAD approximate to 3.8 mu m). Three weeks later, animals were challenged subsequently with two ramped concentrations of MDI aerosol (average concentrations 16 and 49 mg/m(3) air, each for 15 min) and two different particle sizes, i.e., the MMAD was either approximate to 1.6 mu m or approximate to 5.1 mu m for the small-and large-size aerosol, respectively. Respiratory sensitization was assessed by two endpoints: the measurement of respiratory rate, and examination of influx of eosinophilic granulocytes into the mucosa and submucosa of the trachea, bronchi, and lung-associated lymph nodes (LALN). The recruitment of eosinophilic granulocytes into bronchial tissues was subdivided as follows: muscularis mucosae, submucosa, and perivascular. From measurements of respiratory rate, it would appear that guinea pigs sensitized by id injections or by inhalation exposure with the large aerosol tended to display a higher responsiveness than naive controls when challenged with the small aerosol, The recruitment of eosinophilic granulocytes in the bronchial tissue was greater in both inhalation induction groups as compared to the vehicle control. It appears that there was a somewhat greater response in animals sensitized by id injections or by inhalation exposure with the large aerosol and challenged with the small aerosol. Topographically, this difference was apparent only at the bronchial perivascular level and lung-associated lymph nodes (LALN), whereas at the submucosal and muscularis mucosae level the impact on particle size tended to be less pronounced. In summary, this study suggests that a brief, high-level inhalation exposure of MDI aerosol caused a sensitization of bronchial tissues in guinea pigs. The higher sensitization potency of the large aerosol may possibly be related to a dosimetric phenomenon because of the greater fraction of deposition of large particles within the upper respiratory tract. Overall, challenge exposures with this type of irritant aerosol appear to evoke more consistent effects when the MMAD is in the range of approximate to 2 rather than approximate to 5 mu m.
引用
收藏
页码:105 / 113
页数:9
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   AIRWAY RESPONSES FOLLOWING INTRADERMAL SENSITIZATION TO DIFFERENT TYPES OF ALLERGENS - OVALBUMIN, TRIMELLITIC ANHYDRIDE AND DERMATOPHAGOIDES-FARINAE [J].
ARAKAWA, H ;
LOTVALL, J ;
KAWIKOVA, I ;
MORIKAWA, A ;
LOFDAHL, CG ;
SKOOGH, BE .
INTERNATIONAL ARCHIVES OF ALLERGY AND IMMUNOLOGY, 1995, 108 (03) :274-280
[2]   NEUROPEPTIDES IN THE RESPIRATORY-TRACT .2. [J].
BARNES, PJ ;
BARANIUK, JN ;
BELVISI, MG .
AMERICAN REVIEW OF RESPIRATORY DISEASE, 1991, 144 (06) :1391-1399
[3]  
BARNES PJ, 1991, HDB EXPT PHARM, V98, P54
[4]   RESPIRATORY ALLERGY - HAZARD IDENTIFICATION AND RISK ASSESSMENT [J].
BRIATICOVANGOSA, G ;
BRAUN, CLJ ;
COOKMAN, G ;
HOFMANN, T ;
KIMBER, I ;
LOVELESS, SE ;
MORROW, T ;
PAULUHN, J ;
SORENSEN, T ;
NIESSEN, HJ .
FUNDAMENTAL AND APPLIED TOXICOLOGY, 1994, 23 (02) :145-158
[5]   EOSINOPHIL-MEDIATED INJURY TO LUNG PARENCHYMAL-CELLS AND INTERSTITIAL MATRIX - A POSSIBLE ROLE FOR EOSINOPHILS IN CHRONIC INFLAMMATORY DISORDERS OF THE LOWER RESPIRATORY-TRACT [J].
DAVIS, WB ;
FELLS, GA ;
SUN, XH ;
GADEK, JE ;
VENET, A ;
CRYSTAL, RG .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION, 1984, 74 (01) :269-278
[6]  
ESILVA JRL, 1997, MEM I OSW CRUZ S2, V92, P223
[7]  
ESILVA JRL, 1993, IMMUNOLOGY, V65, P523
[8]   THE EOSINOPHIL AND THE PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF ASTHMA [J].
FRIGAS, E ;
GLEICH, GJ .
JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 1986, 77 (04) :527-537
[9]  
GAD SC, 1982, PRINCIPLES METHODS T, P280
[10]  
HAYES JP, 1992, BRIT J PHARMACOL, V106, P828