Discriminant validity and relative precision for classifying patients with nonspecific neck and back pain by anatomic pain patterns

被引:68
作者
Werneke, M
Hart, DL
机构
[1] CentraState Med Ctr, Spine Ctr, Freehold, NJ 07728 USA
[2] Focus Therapeut Outcome, White Stone, VA USA
关键词
centralization; discriminant validity; noncentralization; nonspecific spinal pain; relative precision;
D O I
10.1097/00007632-200301150-00012
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. Secondary analysis of a previously described cohort of prospective, consecutive patients with acute neck or low back pain referred to outpatient rehabilitation was performed. Objective. To estimate discriminant validity and relative precision of two classification procedures (first visit vs multiple visit) in discriminating short-term pain intensity and perceived disability outcomes. Summary of Background Data. Centralization and noncentralization are pain responses used to classify patients and predict outcomes. Different time frames have been proposed for operationally defining these responses, which are problematic for comparing outcomes across clinical trials. Classifying patients according to pain response observed from initial examination (first visit) and overtime (multiple visits) influences prevalence within categories and interpretation of classification usefulness, which merits further investigation. Methods. Patients with acute onset of nonspecific neck or low back pain referred to two outpatient physical therapy clinics completed body pain diagrams, pain intensity ratings, and disability questionnaires at initial evaluation, during each visit, and at discharge. Therapists collected data enabling patient classification on initial examination and throughout treatment. Differences in pain and disability from intake to discharge from rehabilitation across classification categories were used to assess discriminant validity. Relative precision was estimated by determining ratios of analysis of covariance F values between classification procedures for pain and disability. Results. Both classification procedures discriminated categories for change in pain and disability. The multiple-visit classification procedure was more precise for discriminating outcomes than the first-visit classification procedure. Conclusion. Multiple-visit classification of patients into specific pain pattern subgroups is recommended when pain intensity and disability outcomes are of interest.
引用
收藏
页码:161 / 166
页数:6
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2000, Foundations of clinical research: applications to practice
[2]   Beyond the good prognosis - Examination of an inception cohort of patients with chronic low back pain [J].
Carey, TS ;
Garrett, JM ;
Jackman, AM .
SPINE, 2000, 25 (01) :115-120
[3]   Predicting poor outcomes for back pain seen in primary care using patients' own criteria [J].
Cherkin, DC ;
Deyo, RA ;
Street, JH ;
Barlow, W .
SPINE, 1996, 21 (24) :2900-2907
[4]   Pain-related fear is more disabling than pain itself: evidence on the role of pain-related fear in chronic back pain disability [J].
Crombez, G ;
Vlaeyen, JWS ;
Heuts, PHTG ;
Lysens, R .
PAIN, 1999, 80 (1-2) :329-339
[5]   A TREATMENT-BASED CLASSIFICATION APPROACH TO LOW-BACK SYNDROME - IDENTIFYING AND STAGING PATIENTS FOR CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT [J].
DELITTO, A ;
ERHARD, RE ;
BOWLING, R .
PHYSICAL THERAPY, 1995, 75 (06) :470-485
[6]  
Dixon W.J., 1951, Introduction to Statistical Analysis
[7]   A prospective study of centralization of lumbar and referred pain - A predictor of symptomatic discs and anular competence [J].
Donelson, R ;
Aprill, C ;
Medcalf, R ;
Grant, W .
SPINE, 1997, 22 (10) :1115-1122
[8]   CENTRALIZATION PHENOMENON - ITS USEFULNESS IN EVALUATING AND TREATING REFERRED PAIN [J].
DONELSON, R ;
SILVA, G ;
MURPHY, K .
SPINE, 1990, 15 (03) :211-213
[9]  
Fairbank J C, 1980, Physiotherapy, V66, P271
[10]   Hop tests as predictors of dynamic knee stability [J].
Fitzgerald, GK ;
Lephart, SA ;
Hwang, JH ;
Wainner, MRS .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC & SPORTS PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2001, 31 (10) :588-597