Why does energy intensity fluctuate in China?

被引:98
作者
Chai, Jian [1 ,2 ]
Guo, Ju-E [1 ]
Wang, Shou-Yang [2 ]
Lai, Kin Keung [3 ]
机构
[1] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Management, Xian 710049, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Sci, Acad Math & Syst Sci, Beijing 10080, Peoples R China
[3] City Univ Hong Kong, Dept Management Sci, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Input-occupancy-output table; Structure decomposition analysis; Path analysis; STRUCTURAL DECOMPOSITION; EFFICIENCY; ECONOMY; INDUSTRY; PRICES;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2009.08.037
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Energy intensity reflects energy usage efficiency of an economy, in the process of production and consuming of economic output. Why does energy intensity fluctuate in China? In this paper, we explores the distortion of different energy prices, the change of energy structure, technological and final demand structure and their impact on energy intensity in China, based on the path analysis method and input-output structure decomposition model, respectively. And three results have been showed in this paper: first, proved that optimize the relative prices of different types of energy is the most important pricing mechanism when cut down the energy intensity; second, showed that the proportion of oil consumption is the limiting factor that has led to energy intensity change; third, built an input-output structure decomposition analysis model and analyzed technological changes, final demand structure changes, and their direct and indirect impact on energy intensity based on energy input-occupancy-output tables of 30 industry sectors of China in 1992, 1997, 2002 and 2004, which suggest that the fluctuation of energy intensity is mainly due to technology advances and the corresponding change in industrial structure. Crown Copyright (C) 2009 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:5717 / 5731
页数:15
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   Comparison of energy intensities in European Union countries.: Results of a structural decomposition analysis [J].
Alcántara, V ;
Duarte, R .
ENERGY POLICY, 2004, 32 (02) :177-189
[2]   Technology diffusion and energy intensity in US commercial buildings [J].
Andrews, Clinton J. ;
Krogmann, Uta .
ENERGY POLICY, 2009, 37 (02) :541-553
[3]   Factorizing changes in energy and environmental indicators through decomposition [J].
Ang, BW ;
Zhang, FQ ;
Choi, KH .
ENERGY, 1998, 23 (06) :489-495
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2007, CHIN STAT YB 2007
[5]   Prices, technology development and the rebound effect [J].
Birol, F ;
Keppler, JH .
ENERGY POLICY, 2000, 28 (6-7) :457-469
[6]   AN INDEX NUMBER FRAMEWORK FOR EXPLAINING CHANGES IN INPUT PRODUCTIVITY - AN APPLICATION TO ENERGY EFFICIENCY [J].
CHAN, MWL ;
MOUNTAIN, DC .
APPLIED ECONOMICS, 1990, 22 (06) :785-794
[7]  
*CHIN EN DEV STRAT, 2004, REV EC RES, V84, P51
[8]   The energy intensity of transition countries [J].
Cornillie, J ;
Fankhauser, S .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2004, 26 (03) :283-295
[9]  
Fisher-Vanden K, 2004, RESOUR ENERGY ECON, V26, P77, DOI 10.1016/j.resenecco.2003.07.002
[10]  
Garbaccio RF, 1999, ENERGY J, V20, P63