Symmetric and asymmetric mitotic segregation patterns influence Wolbachia distribution in host somatic tissue

被引:49
作者
Albertson, Roger [2 ]
Casper-Lindley, Catharina [1 ]
Cao, Jian [1 ]
Tram, Uyen [3 ]
Sullivan, William [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95064 USA
[2] Albion Coll, Dept Biol, Albion, MI 49224 USA
[3] Ohio State Univ, Dept Microbiol, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
关键词
Mitosis; Wolbachia; Drosophila; Neuroblasts; CENTRAL-NERVOUS-SYSTEM; DROSOPHILA NEUROBLAST DIVISIONS; CELL FATE DETERMINANTS; SPINDLE ORIENTATION; EXTRINSIC CUES; STEM-CELLS; ALPHA-I; POLARITY; INFECTION; BACTERIA;
D O I
10.1242/jcs.054981
中图分类号
Q2 [细胞生物学];
学科分类号
071009 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Wolbachia are maternally inherited bacterial endosymbionts that occupy many but not all tissues of adult insects. During the initial mitotic divisions in Drosophila embryogenesis, Wolbachia exhibit a symmetric pattern of segregation. Wolbachia undergo microtubule-dependent and cell-cycle-regulated movement between centrosomes. Symmetric segregation occurs during late anaphase when Wolbachia cluster around duplicated and separating centrosomes. This centrosome association is microtubule-dependent and promotes an even Wolbachia distribution throughout the host embryo. By contrast, during the later embryonic and larval neuroblast divisions, Wolbachia segregate asymmetrically with the apical self-renewing neuroblast. During these polarized asymmetric neuroblast divisions, Wolbachia colocalize with the apical centrosome and apically localized Par complex. This localization depends on microtubules, but not the cortical actin- based cytoskeleton. We also found that Wolbachia concentrate in specific regions of the adult brain, which might be a direct consequence of the asymmetric Wolbachia segregation in the earlier neuroblast divisions. Finally, we demonstrate that the fidelity of asymmetric segregation to the self-renewing neuroblast is lower in the virulent Popcorn strain of Wolbachia.
引用
收藏
页码:4570 / 4583
页数:14
相关论文
共 73 条
[1]   Dlg, Scrib and Lgl regulate neuroblast cell size and mitotic spindle asymmetry [J].
Albertson, R ;
Doe, CQ .
NATURE CELL BIOLOGY, 2003, 5 (02) :166-170
[2]  
[Anonymous], EMBRYONIC DEV DROSOP
[3]   Drosophila nonmuscle myosin II promotes the asymmetric segregation of cell fate determinants by cortical exclusion rather than active transport [J].
Barros, CS ;
Phelps, CB ;
Brand, AH .
DEVELOPMENTAL CELL, 2003, 5 (06) :829-840
[4]   Cooperative regulation of cell polarity and growth by Drosophila tumor suppressors [J].
Bilder, D ;
Li, M ;
Perrimon, N .
SCIENCE, 2000, 289 (5476) :113-116
[5]   Extrinsic cues, intrinsic cues and microfilaments regulate asymmetric protein localization in Drosophila neuroblasts [J].
Broadus, J ;
Doe, CQ .
CURRENT BIOLOGY, 1997, 7 (11) :827-835
[6]   Apical complex genes control mitotic spindle geometry and relative size of daughter cells in Drosophila neuroblast and pl asymmetric divisions [J].
Cai, Y ;
Yu, FW ;
Lin, SP ;
Chia, W ;
Yang, XH .
CELL, 2003, 112 (01) :51-62
[7]  
CALLAINI G, 1994, J CELL SCI, V107, P673
[8]   Nuf, a Rab11 effector, maintains cytokinetic furrow integrity by promoting local actin polymerization [J].
Cao, Jian ;
Albertson, Roger ;
Riggs, Blake ;
Field, Christine M. ;
Sullivan, William .
JOURNAL OF CELL BIOLOGY, 2008, 182 (02) :301-313
[9]   Patterns of cell division and expression of asymmetric cell fate determinants in postembryonic neuroblast lineages of Drosophila [J].
Ceron, J ;
González, C ;
Tejedor, FJ .
DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY, 2001, 230 (02) :125-138
[10]   Wolbachia modification of sperm does not always require residence within developing sperm [J].
Clark, M. E. ;
Bailey-Jourdain, C. ;
Ferree, P. M. ;
England, S. J. ;
Sullivan, W. ;
Windsor, D. M. ;
Werren, J. H. .
HEREDITY, 2008, 101 (05) :420-428