Asia's national innovation systems: Institutional adaptability and rigidity in the face of global innovation challenges

被引:62
作者
Dodgson, Mark [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Sch Business, Technol & Innovat Management Ctr, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
关键词
National innovation systems; Asia; Institutional adaptation and rigidity; CULTURE; TAIWAN; IMPACT; KOREA; FIRMS;
D O I
10.1007/s10490-008-9105-4
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
This paper explores several features of, and changes in, innovation capacity in Asia. The growth of technology-based industries has been a critically important element of Asian industrial development and has required extensive institutional support for the diffusion of innovation and technological learning. As a number of Asian countries reach the global technological frontier they need to develop new capabilities for creating "radical" innovations in order to sustain their international competitiveness. Using the analytical frameworks of national innovation systems and varieties of capitalism, the paper reviews some systemic and environmental factors encouraging and constraining these developments. By referring to illustrative case studies of institutional evolution within Taiwan's national innovation system and technological entrepreneurship in Korea, the paper argues that whilst there are major developments in models of innovation support, emulating those found in liberal market economies, enduring cultural legacies can remain influential. It highlights the central importance of social as well as economic institutional adaptation. Some management and policy implications of this attribute are considered, and a future research agenda is proposed.
引用
收藏
页码:589 / 609
页数:21
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]   How entrepreneurial firms can benefit from alliances with large partners [J].
Alvarez, SA ;
Barney, JB .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT EXECUTIVE, 2001, 15 (01) :139-148
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1992, NATL SYSTEM INNOVATI
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2004, GOVERNING MARKET EC
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2007, Main Science and Technology Indicators, V2007/2
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Main Science and Technology Indicators
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1996, NATL DIVERSITY GLOBA
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1997, NAT INN SYST
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2000, Technology, Learning, and Innovation: Experiences of Newly Industrializing Economies
[9]  
Baumol W. J., 2002, The Free-Market Innovation Machine: Analyzing the Growth Miracle of Capitalism
[10]   Developing difference:: Social organization and the rise of the auto industries of South Korea, Taiwan, Spain, and Argentina [J].
Biggart, NW ;
Guillén, MF .
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1999, 64 (05) :722-747