Macropriemies: Underprivilged newborns

被引:27
作者
Amiel-Tison, C [1 ]
Allen, MC [1 ]
Lebrun, F [1 ]
Rogowski, J [1 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ Hosp, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
来源
MENTAL RETARDATION AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES RESEARCH REVIEWS | 2002年 / 8卷 / 04期
关键词
prematurity; disability; NICU; cerebral palsy;
D O I
10.1002/mrdd.10042
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
The focus of neonatal intensive care has been on very low birthweight infants, who comprise only 1.4% of neonates. Too little attention is paid to moderately preterm infants that we call macropremies or moderately low birthweight infants (MLBW, with birthweights 1500-2500 grams). Admitting over half MLBW infants to normal nurseries presumes that they have few needs and an excellent prognosis similar to fullterm newborns. It does not take into account the macropremie's vulnerability to complications of prematurity due to immature organ systems. Obstetricians are increasingly willing to deliver these infants prematurely for signs of fetal distress. As many as 25% of children with cerebral palsy referred to a disability clinic in Paris were MLBW, with hypoxic-ischemic-inflammatory associated disorders in one-third. The majority of MLBW infants who required neonatal intensive care at a tertiary care center in Baltimore had complications of prematurity: 47% had respiratory problems, 20% had feeding intolerance and 9% had hypoglycemia. MLBW infants comprise 5-7% of the neonatal population but account for 14% of neonatal deaths, 18-37% of children with cerebral palsy and 7-12% of children with mental retardation. Increasing the level of neonatal care for the macropremie's transition to extrauterine life would be economically feasible if it prevented as few as 30% of cases of major disability. A change in attitude towards this low risk (but not risk free) group of MLBW infants will both reduce morbidity and improve their health and neurodevelopmental outcome. It includes: 1) Providing an intermediate level of neonatal care for a short duration, with close monitoring and prompt intervention as needed, and 2) Neonatal neurodevelopmental screening to allow focused neurodevelopmental followup of MLBW infants with abnormalities. (C) 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:281 / 292
页数:12
相关论文
共 84 条
[1]  
Alexander G R, 1996, J Perinatol, V16, P53
[2]  
Alexander GR, 1999, PAEDIATR PERINAT EP, V13, P205
[3]  
Allen MC, 1998, PRENAT NEONAT MED, V3, P56
[4]   Racial differences in temporal changes in newborn viability and survival by gestational age [J].
Allen, MC ;
Alexander, GR ;
Tompkins, ME ;
Hulsey, TC .
PAEDIATRIC AND PERINATAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2000, 14 (02) :152-158
[5]  
ALLEN MC, 1992, INFANT YOUNG CHILD, V5, P13
[6]  
ALLEN MC, 2002, SEMIN NEONATOL, V6
[7]  
*AM AC PED, 2000, 2000 REDB REP COMM I
[8]  
Amiel-Tison Claudine, 1998, Croatian Medical Journal, V39, P136
[9]   Does neurological assessment still have a place in the NICU? [J].
AmielTison, C .
ACTA PAEDIATRICA, 1996, 85 :31-38
[10]  
AMIELTISON C, 2002, IN PRESS PEDIAT NEUR, V27