Therapeutic drug monitoring of immunosuppressive drugs in kidney transplantation

被引:41
作者
Holt, DW [1 ]
机构
[1] St George Hosp, Sch Med, Analyt Unit, London SW17 0RE, England
关键词
immunosuppressive drugs; therapeutic drug monitoring; drug pharmacokinetics;
D O I
10.1097/00041552-200211000-00014
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose of review Drug monitoring has become an accepted adjunct to optimizing therapy with immunosuppressive drugs. This review assesses publications that relate to the analytical techniques used to measure cyclosporin, tacrolimus, mycophenolic acid, sirolimus and everolimus, as well as the clinical data obtained for these drugs. For all of these drugs there has been a substantial and continuing investment in assessing the clinical value of drug monitoring. Recent findings Fundamental controversies still persist regarding which time point to use for monitoring. The most significant single development has been the move towards using a timed blood sample 2 h after drug administration (C-2) to monitor cyclosporin therapy with the Neoral formulation. The favourable clinical results obtained with this approach have had an impact on reevaluating monitoring data for some of the other drugs. The newest drugs to reach clinical evaluation, sirolimus and everolimus, have been studied in the context of concentration-controlled dosing and there is a good rationale for their measurement. There have also been developments in the analytical techniques used, mostly to improve the selectivity of the assays or to adapt them to new monitoring strategies. Summary Interpretation of drug concentration data is becoming ever more complex in this field as the number of potential drug combinations expands. The relatively narrow therapeutic index of these agents and the ever-present risk of clinically significant pharmacokinetic drug interactions makes drug monitoring an important aspect of their prescription.
引用
收藏
页码:657 / 663
页数:7
相关论文
共 76 条
[1]   New developments in the immunosuppressive drug monitoring of cyclosporine, tacrolimus, and azathioprine [J].
Armstrong, VW ;
Oellerich, M .
CLINICAL BIOCHEMISTRY, 2001, 34 (01) :9-16
[2]   Adverse gastrointestinal effects of mycophenolate mofetil - Aetiology, incidence and management [J].
Behrend, M .
DRUG SAFETY, 2001, 24 (09) :645-663
[3]   Enteric coating of mycophenolate sodium: A rational approach to limit topical gastrointestinal lesions and extend the therapeutic index of mycophenolate [J].
Bjarnason, I .
TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2001, 33 (7-8) :3238-3240
[4]   Tacrolimus-induced nephrotoxicity unmasked by induction of the CYP3A4 system with St John's wort [J].
Bolley, R ;
Zulke, C ;
Kammerl, M ;
Fischereder, M ;
Kramer, BK .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2002, 73 (06) :1009-1009
[5]   High-throughput semi-automated 96-well liquid/liquid extraction and liquid chromatography/mass spectrometric analysis of everolimus (RAD 001) and cyclosporin a (CsA) in whole blood [J].
Brignol, N ;
McMahon, LM ;
Luo, S ;
Tse, FLS .
RAPID COMMUNICATIONS IN MASS SPECTROMETRY, 2001, 15 (12) :898-907
[6]  
Cantarovich M, 1998, CLIN TRANSPLANT, V12, P243
[7]   Pharmacokinetics help optimizing mycophenolate mofetil dosing in kidney transplant patients [J].
Cattaneo, D ;
Gaspari, F ;
Ferrari, S ;
Stucchi, N ;
Del Priore, L ;
Perico, N ;
Gotti, E ;
Remuzzi, G .
CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2001, 15 (06) :402-409
[8]   Recommendations for the implementation of Neoral C2 monitoring in clinical practice [J].
Cole, E ;
Midtvedt, K ;
Johnston, A ;
Pattison, J ;
O'Grady, C .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2002, 73 (09) :S19-S22
[9]   Limited sampling strategies for estimating cyclosporin area under the concentration-time curve: Review of current algorithms [J].
David, OJ ;
Johnston, A .
THERAPEUTIC DRUG MONITORING, 2001, 23 (02) :100-114
[10]   Simultaneous quantification of sirolimus, everolimus, tacrolimus and cyclosporine by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) [J].
Deters, M ;
Kirchner, G ;
Resch, K ;
Kaever, V .
CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2002, 40 (03) :285-292