Examining supply chain relationships: Do buyer and supplier perspectives on collaborative relationships differ?

被引:620
作者
Nyaga, Gilbert N. [1 ]
Whipple, Judith M. [2 ]
Lynch, Daniel F. [3 ]
机构
[1] Northeastern Univ, Coll Business Adm, Informat Operat & Anal Grp, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Michigan State Univ, Dept Supply Chain Management, Eli Broad Coll Business, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[3] Dalhousie Univ, Ctr Int Trade & Transportat, Halifax, NS B3H 3J5, Canada
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Collaborative relationships; Commitment; Trust; Satisfaction; Supply chain alliances; Invariance testing; MEASUREMENT INVARIANCE; PERFORMANCE; COMMITMENT; TRUST; COMMUNICATION; INVESTMENTS; GOVERNANCE; ALLIANCES; SUCCESS; DETERMINANTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jom.2009.07.005
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Firms are building collaborative relationships with their supply chain partners in order to achieve efficiencies, flexibility, and sustainable competitive advantage. However, it is unclear if collaborative relationships provide benefits that compensate for the additional expense associated with such relationships. Further, it is unclear what factors promote successful collaborations. This research examines collaborative relationships in two separate studies using structural equation modeling: one study examines buyers' perceptions and the second study examines suppliers' perceptions. The two studies are then compared using invariance testing in order to determine economic and relational factors that drive satisfaction and performance from each party's perspective. Results show that collaborative activities, such as information sharing, joint relationship effort, and dedicated investments lead to trust and commitment. Trust and commitment, in turn, lead to improved satisfaction and performance. Results from the two independent studies exhibit similarities and differences; while the conceptual model is highly similar, certain paths vary in their significance and/or their importance across buyer and supplier firms such that buyers focus more on relationship outcomes while suppliers look to safeguard their transaction specific investments through information sharing and joint relationship effort. Managerial and theoretical implications of the findings are discussed. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:101 / 114
页数:14
相关论文
共 85 条
[1]  
ADAMS JS, 1965, ADV EXP SOC PSYCHOL, V2, P267
[2]   A different paradigm for the initial colonisation of Sahul [J].
Allen, Jim ;
O'Connell, James F. .
ARCHAEOLOGY IN OCEANIA, 2020, 55 (01) :1-14
[3]   THE USE OF PLEDGES TO BUILD AND SUSTAIN COMMITMENT IN DISTRIBUTION CHANNELS [J].
ANDERSON, E ;
WEITZ, B .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1992, 29 (01) :18-34
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1995, J MARKETING, DOI DOI 10.2307/1252016
[5]   ESTIMATING NONRESPONSE BIAS IN MAIL SURVEYS [J].
ARMSTRONG, JS ;
OVERTON, TS .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1977, 14 (03) :396-402
[6]  
Baumgartner H., 1998, Marketing Letters, V9, P21, DOI [10.1023/A:10079119030322, DOI 10.1023/A:10079119030322, 10.1023/A:1007911903032]
[7]   Buyer-supplier relations in industrial markets: When do buyers risk making idiosyncratic investments? [J].
Bensaou, M ;
Anderson, E .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 1999, 10 (04) :460-481
[8]   The influence of power driven buyer/seller relationships on supply chain satisfaction [J].
Benton, WC ;
Maloni, M .
JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2005, 23 (01) :1-22
[9]  
Blau P., 1964, Exchange and Power in Social Life
[10]   PRICE, AUTHORITY, AND TRUST - FROM IDEAL TYPES TO PLURAL FORMS [J].
BRADACH, JL ;
ECCLES, RG .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF SOCIOLOGY, 1989, 15 :97-118