Promotion of cooperation on networks? The myopic best response case

被引:52
作者
Roca, C. P. [1 ]
Cuesta, J. A. [1 ]
Sanchez, A. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Carlos III Madrid, Dept Matemat, GISC, Madrid 28911, Spain
[2] CSIC UAM UC3M UCM, Inst Ciencias Matemat, Madrid 28006, Spain
[3] Univ Zaragoza, Inst Biocomputac & Fis Sistemas Complejos BIFI, E-50009 Zaragoza, Spain
关键词
EVOLUTIONARY GAMES; DYNAMICS;
D O I
10.1140/epjb/e2009-00189-0
中图分类号
O469 [凝聚态物理学];
学科分类号
070205 ;
摘要
We study the effect of a network of contacts on the emergence of cooperation on social dilemmas under myopic best response dynamics. We begin by summarizing the main features observed under less intellectually demanding dynamics, pointing out their most relevant general characteristics. Subsequently we focus on the new framework of best response. By means of an extensive numerical simulation program we show that, contrary to the rest of dynamics considered so far, best response is largely unaffected by the underlying network, which implies that, in most cases, no promotion of cooperation is found with this dynamics. We do find, however, nontrivial results differing from the well-mixed population in the case of coordination games on lattices, which we explain in terms of the formation of spatial clusters and the conditions for their advancement, subsequently discussing their relevance to other networks.
引用
收藏
页码:587 / 595
页数:9
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1982, EVOLUTION THEORY GAM
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2003, STAG HUNT EVOLUTION
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2004, EC RIGHTS COOPERATIO
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2000, Game theory evolving
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1998, EVOLUTIONARY GAMES P
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2001, RANDOM GRAPHS
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1965, PRISONERS DILEMMA ST
[8]   THE EVOLUTION OF COOPERATION [J].
AXELROD, R ;
HAMILTON, WD .
SCIENCE, 1981, 211 (4489) :1390-1396
[9]   Emergence of scaling in random networks [J].
Barabási, AL ;
Albert, R .
SCIENCE, 1999, 286 (5439) :509-512
[10]   THE STATISTICAL-MECHANICS OF STRATEGIC INTERACTION [J].
BLUME, LE .
GAMES AND ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR, 1993, 5 (03) :387-424