In the 1920s Curt Richter (1927) stated that the central problem for psychology was to discover the determinants of the initiation and termination of bouts of behavior. Ignoring this challenge, experimentation in animal psychology has been dominated by the session paradigm in which animals work in brief sessions for a resource of which they have been deprived. In this open economy, no behavioral strategy of the animal can meet its demand, and the beginnings and ends of bouts are controlled by the experimenter; thus, Richter's problem cannot be addressed. In contrast, in a free-feeding, closed economy, the animal controls the initiation and termination of feeding and can regulate its intake, and bout patterns can be observed. If the paradigm is modified to simulate a habitat where resources are distributed discontinuously and the animal must work to discover and procure access to a commodity before it can be used, behavioral strategies allowing the animal to regulate its intake while tending to maximize the ratio of benefits to costs are revealed. We offer an answer to Richter's question based on a cost/benefit analysis of feeding behavior in this foraging paradigm. We show that the time and energy costs of resource acquisition and resource consumption are powerful determinants of the pattern of resource use, and that they have different and independent effects. The former costs are reduced by reducing the frequency of initiating bouts, and the latter costs, by altering the rate and amount of consumption. Further, the time window of these relations is much longer than expected from analyses in the session paradigm. We conclude that the recurrent nature of behavior is due to the discontinuous distribution of resources rather than to cycles of physiological depletion and repletion, and that the determinants of bout initiation and termination lie in the economics of the allocation of time and effort to different resources and activities. (C) 1997 Academic Press Limited.