Trade and the location of industries: Some new results

被引:13
作者
Laussel, Didier
Paul, Thierry
机构
[1] Univ Mediterranee, Ctr Vieille Charite, GREQAM, IDEP, F-13002 Marseille, France
[2] Univ Mediterranee, GREQAM, IDEP, F-13290 Les Milles, France
关键词
country size; differentiated goods; transport costs; net inter-industry trade; pattern of trade;
D O I
10.1016/j.jinteco.2006.06.003
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We study a two-country two-sector model with free entry and monopolistic competition where both industries use labour to produce differentiated goods. The two countries are identical except for size. Labour is freely mobile across industries but it cannot move internationally. Transport costs affect both industries. The location of industries and the pattern of trade are the results of the interaction of two effects: the home market effect and the wage differential effect. The main results are: (i) if the two countries are sufficiently close in size and demand elasticities differ across industries (transport costs being equal), a continuous fall in transport costs from a prohibitive level to zero is associated with a reversal in the pattern of trade at some intermediate level. For large transport costs, the large country is a net exporter of the more differentiated good. For lower transport costs, the large country becomes a net exporter of the less differentiated good; (ii) if the two countries are very different in size and demand elasticities differ across industries (transport costs being equal), the larger country is always a net exporter of the less differentiated good. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:148 / 166
页数:19
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   Inter-industry trade in manufactures: Does country size matter? [J].
Amiti, M .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 1998, 44 (02) :231-255
[2]  
Davis DR, 1998, AM ECON REV, V88, P1264
[3]   Market access, economic geography and comparative advantage: an empirical test [J].
Davis, DR ;
Weinstein, DE .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2003, 59 (01) :1-23
[4]  
ETHIER W, 1979, J INT ECON, V15, P313
[5]  
HANSON GH, 2002, NBER WORKING PAPER, V9076
[6]   Increasing returns versus national product differentiation as an explanation for the pattern of US-Canada trade [J].
Head, K ;
Ries, J .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2001, 91 (04) :858-876
[7]   On the pervasiveness of home market effects [J].
Head, K ;
Mayertt, T ;
Ries, J .
ECONOMICA, 2002, 69 (275) :371-390
[8]  
Helpman E., 1985, Market structure and foreign trade
[9]   Does home market size matter for the pattem of trade? [J].
Holmes, TJ ;
Stevens, JJ .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2005, 65 (02) :489-505
[10]  
KRUGMAN P, 1980, AM ECON REV, V70, P950