A randomized, controlled trial of medical therapy versus endoscopic ligation for the prevention of variceal rebleeding in patients with cirrhosis

被引:164
作者
Patch, D
Sabin, CA
Goulis, J
Gerunda, G
Greenslade, L
Merkel, C
Burroughs, AK
机构
[1] Univ London, Royal Free Hosp Hampstead NHS Trust, Dept Liver Transplantat & Hepatobiliary Med, Dept Surg, London NW3 2QG, England
[2] UCL Royal Free & Univ Coll Med Sch, Dept Primary Care & Populat Sci, London, England
[3] Univ Padua, Dept Clin & Expt Med, Padua, Italy
关键词
D O I
10.1053/gast.2002.35955
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background & Aims: Patients who have had one variceal bleed are at high risk of rebleeding. Since its introduction, endoscopic variceal banding has been shown to be superior to needle sclerotherapy. Banding has not been compared with hepatic venous pressure-guided medical therapy (beta-blockers and nitrates). Methods: One hundred two patients with cirrhosis and a recent esophageal variceal bleed were randomized to either endoscopic banding (51 patients) or medical therapy (51 patients). The hepatic venous pressure gradient was measured in all patients at baseline, at 3 months (drug therapy arm), and at yearly intervals (all patients). Primary end points were death or rebleeding. Results: The 2 groups were well matched. Fifty-one percent were Pughs C, with a median Pughs score of 9.5. Nineteen patients rebled in the drug arm (median time, 24 days) and 27 patients in the banding arm (median time, 24 days). At 1 year, 43.7% of patients had bled in the drug arm compared with 53.8% in the banding arm (P = 0.25). Thirty-two percent of patients on medical therapy had died at 1 year, 22.5% on banding (P = 0.97). Conclusions: In the prevention of variceal rebleeding, beta-blockers +/-nitrates are as effective as endoscopic banding.
引用
收藏
页码:1013 / 1019
页数:7
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
Armonis A, 1996, ITAL J GASTROENTEROL, V28, P272
[2]   Endoscopic sclerotherapy versus variceal ligation in the long-term management of patients with cirrhosis after variceal bleeding - A prospective randomized study [J].
Avgerinos, A ;
Armonis, A ;
Manolakopoulos, S ;
Poulianos, G ;
Rekoumis, G ;
Sgourou, A ;
Gouma, P ;
Raptis, S .
JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY, 1997, 26 (05) :1034-1041
[3]  
Baroncini D, 1997, ENDOSCOPY, V29, P235
[4]  
DAMICO G, 1995, HEPATOLOGY, V22, P332, DOI 10.1002/hep.1840220145
[5]  
DEFRANCHIS R, 1996, P 2 INT CONS WORKSH
[6]  
Fakhry S., 1997, Hepatology, V26, p137A
[7]   RELATION BETWEEN PORTAL PRESSURE RESPONSE TO PHARMACOTHERAPY AND RISK OF RECURRENT VARICEAL HEMORRHAGE IN PATIENTS WITH CIRRHOSIS [J].
FEU, F ;
GARCIAPAGAN, JC ;
BOSCH, J ;
LUCA, A ;
TERES, J ;
ESCORSELL, A ;
RODES, J .
LANCET, 1995, 346 (8982) :1056-1059
[8]  
Freedman L S, 1982, Stat Med, V1, P121, DOI 10.1002/sim.4780010204
[9]   PROPRANOLOL COMPARED WITH PROPRANOLOL PLUS ISOSORBIDE-5-MONONITRATE FOR PORTAL-HYPERTENSION IN CIRRHOSIS - A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-STUDY [J].
GARCIAPAGAN, JC ;
FEU, F ;
BOSCH, J ;
RODES, J .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1991, 114 (10) :869-873
[10]   RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF VARICEAL BANDING LIGATION VERSUS INJECTION SCLEROTHERAPY FOR BLEEDING ESOPHAGEAL-VARICES [J].
GIMSON, AES ;
RAMAGE, JK ;
PANOS, MZ ;
HAYLLAR, K ;
HARRISON, PM ;
WILLIAMS, R ;
WESTABY, D .
LANCET, 1993, 342 (8868) :391-394