Prediction of clinical cardiovascular events with carotid intima-media thickness - A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:2452
作者
Lorenz, Matthias W.
Markus, Hugh S.
Bots, Michiel L.
Rosvall, Maria
Sitzer, Matthias
机构
[1] Goethe Univ Frankfurt, Dept Neurol, D-60528 Frankfurt, Germany
[2] Univ London St Georges Hosp, London, England
[3] Univ Utrecht, Med Ctr, Julius Ctr Hlth Sci & Primary Care, Utrecht, Netherlands
[4] Erasmus MC, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[5] Lund Univ, Malmo Univ Hosp, Dept Community Med, Malmo, Sweden
关键词
atherosclerosis; carotid arteries; meta-analysis; myocardial infarction; stroke;
D O I
10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.628875
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background - Carotid intima-media thickness ( IMT) is increasingly used as a surrogate marker for atherosclerosis. Its use relies on its ability to predict future clinical cardiovascular end points. We performed a systematic review and meta- analysis of data to examine this association. Methods and Results - Using a prespecified search strategy, we identified 8 relevant studies and compared study design, measurement protocols, and reported data. We identified sources of heterogeneity between studies. The assumption of a linear relationship between IMT and risk was challenged by use of a graphical technique. To obtain a pooled estimate of the relative risk per IMT difference, we performed a meta- analysis based on random effects models. The age- and sex- adjusted overall estimates of the relative risk of myocardial infarction were 1.26 ( 95% CI, 1.21 to 1.30) per 1 - standard deviation common carotid artery IMT difference and 1.15 ( 95% CI, 1.12 to 1.17) per 0.10- mm common carotid artery IMT difference. The age- and sex- adjusted relative risks of stroke were 1.32 ( 95% CI, 1.27 to 1.38) per 1 - standard deviation common carotid artery IMT difference and 1.18 ( 95% CI, 1.16 to 1.21) per 0.10- mm common carotid artery IMT difference. Major sources of heterogeneity were age distribution, carotid segment definition, and IMT measurement protocol. The relationship between IMT and risk was nonlinear, but the linear models fitted relatively well for moderate to high IMT values. Conclusions - Carotid IMT is a strong predictor of future vascular events. The relative risk per IMT difference is slightly higher for the end point stroke than for myocardial infarction. In future IMT studies, ultrasound protocols should be aligned with published studies. Data for younger individuals are limited and more studies are required.
引用
收藏
页码:459 / 467
页数:9
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Analysis of case-cohort designs [J].
Barlow, WE ;
Ichikawa, L ;
Rosner, D ;
Izumi, S .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1999, 52 (12) :1165-1172
[2]   Traditional reviews, meta-analyses and pooled analyses in epidemiology [J].
Blettner, M ;
Sauerbrei, W ;
Schlehofer, B ;
Scheuchenpflug, T ;
Friedenreich, C .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1999, 28 (01) :1-9
[3]   REPRODUCIBILITY OF CAROTID VESSEL WALL THICKNESS MEASUREMENTS - THE ROTTERDAM STUDY [J].
BOTS, ML ;
MULDER, PGH ;
HOFMAN, A ;
VANES, GA ;
GROBBEE, DE .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1994, 47 (08) :921-930
[4]   Common carotid intima-media thickness and risk of stroke and myocardial infarction - The Rotterdam Study [J].
Bots, ML ;
Hoes, AW ;
Koudstaal, PJ ;
Hofman, A ;
Grobbee, DE .
CIRCULATION, 1997, 96 (05) :1432-1437
[5]  
Chambless LE, 2000, AM J EPIDEMIOL, V151, P478
[6]  
Chambless LE, 1997, AM J EPIDEMIOL, V146, P483, DOI 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009302
[7]   Carotid intima-media thickness at different sites: relation to incident myocardial infarction - The Rotterdam Study [J].
del Sol, AI ;
Bots, ML ;
Grobbee, DE ;
Hofman, A ;
Witteman, JCM .
EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2002, 23 (12) :934-940
[8]   METAANALYSIS IN CLINICAL-TRIALS [J].
DERSIMONIAN, R ;
LAIRD, N .
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1986, 7 (03) :177-188
[9]   A nonparametric "trim and fill" method of accounting for publication bias in meta-analysis [J].
Duval, S ;
Tweedie, R .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2000, 95 (449) :89-98
[10]   Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis [J].
Duval, S ;
Tweedie, R .
BIOMETRICS, 2000, 56 (02) :455-463