Users' guides to the medical literature - XXII: How to use articles about clinical decision rules

被引:762
作者
McGinn, TG [1 ]
Guyatt, GH [1 ]
Wyer, PC [1 ]
Naylor, CD [1 ]
Stiell, IG [1 ]
Richardson, WS [1 ]
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, Hlth Sci Ctr, Hamilton, ON L8N 3Z5, Canada
来源
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION | 2000年 / 284卷 / 01期
关键词
D O I
10.1001/jama.284.1.79
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Clinical experience provides clinicians with an intuitive sense of which findings on history, physical examination, and investigation are critical in making an accurate diagnosis, or an accurate assessment of a patient's fate. A clinical decision rule (CDR) is a clinical tool that quantifies the individual contributions that various components of the history, physical examination, and basic laboratory results make toward the diagnosis, prognosis, or likely response to treatment in a patient, Clinical decision rules attempt to formally test, simplify, and increase the accuracy of clinicians' diagnostic and prognostic assessments. Existing CDRs guide clinicians, establish pretest probability, provide screening tests for com mon problems, and estimate risk, Three steps are involved in the development and testing of a CDR: creation of the rule, testing or validating the rule, and assessing the impact of the rule on clinical behavior. Clinicians evaluating CDRs for possible clinical use should assess the following components: the method of derivation; the validation of the CDR to ensure that its repeated use leads to the same results; and its predictive power, We consider CDRs that have been validated in a new clinical setting to be level 1 CDRs and most appropriate for implementation, Level 1 Cops have the potential to inform clinical judgment, to change clinical behavior, and to reduce unnecessary costs, while maintaining quality of care and patient satisfaction.
引用
收藏
页码:79 / 84
页数:6
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Auleley GR, 1997, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V277, P1935
  • [2] Validation of the Ottawa ankle rules in France: A study in the surgical emergency department of a teaching hospital
    Auleley, GR
    Kerboull, L
    Durieux, P
    Cosquer, M
    Courpied, JP
    Ravaud, P
    [J]. ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1998, 32 (01) : 14 - 18
  • [3] APPLICATION OF ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS TO CLINICAL MEDICINE
    BAXT, WG
    [J]. LANCET, 1995, 346 (8983): : 1135 - 1138
  • [4] SCREENING FOR ALCOHOL-ABUSE USING CAGE SCORES AND LIKELIHOOD RATIOS
    BUCHSBAUM, DG
    BUCHANAN, RG
    CENTOR, RM
    SCHNOLL, SH
    LAWTON, MJ
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1991, 115 (10) : 774 - 777
  • [5] Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framewouk for improvement
    Cabana, MD
    Rand, CS
    Powe, NR
    Wu, AW
    Wilson, MH
    Abboud, PAC
    Rubin, HR
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1999, 282 (15): : 1458 - 1465
  • [6] Cameron C, 1999, CAN MED ASSOC J, V160, P1165
  • [7] EMPIRIC COMPARISON OF MULTIVARIATE ANALYTIC TECHNIQUES - ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF RECURSIVE PARTITIONING ANALYSIS
    COOK, EF
    GOLDMAN, L
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHRONIC DISEASES, 1984, 37 (9-10): : 721 - 731
  • [8] Impact of formal continuing medical education - Do conferences, workshops, rounds, and other traditional continuing education activities change physician behavior or health care outcomes?
    Davis, D
    O'Brien, MAT
    Freemantle, N
    Wolf, FM
    Mazmanian, P
    Taylor-Vaisey, A
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1999, 282 (09): : 867 - 874
  • [9] DAVIS DA, 1995, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V274, P700
  • [10] A prediction rule to identify low-risk patients with community-acquired pneumonia
    Fine, MJ
    Auble, TE
    Yealy, DM
    Hanusa, BH
    Weissfeld, LA
    Singer, DE
    Coley, CM
    Marrie, TJ
    Kapoor, WN
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1997, 336 (04) : 243 - 250