Is flow velocity a significant parameter in flood damage modelling?

被引:221
作者
Kreibich, H. [1 ]
Piroth, K. [2 ]
Seifert, I. [1 ]
Maiwald, H. [3 ]
Kunert, U. [4 ]
Schwarz, J. [3 ]
Merz, B. [1 ]
Thieken, A. H. [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Potsdam German Res Ctr Geosci GFZ, Helmholtz Ctr, Hydrol Sect, Potsdam, Germany
[2] ARCADIS Consult GmbH, Karlsruhe, Germany
[3] Bauhaus Univ Weimar, Inst Struct Engn, Earthquake Damage Anal Ctr, D-99423 Weimar, Germany
[4] Deutsch Inst Wirtschaftsforsch DIW Berlin, Berlin, Germany
[5] AlpS Ctr Nat Hazard & Risk Management GmbH, Innsbruck, Austria
[6] Leopold Franzens Univ Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
关键词
ELBE FLOOD; ALLEVIATION; GERMANY;
D O I
10.5194/nhess-9-1679-2009
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Flow velocity is generally presumed to influence flood damage. However, this influence is hardly quantified and virtually no damage models take it into account. Therefore, the influences of flow velocity, water depth and combinations of these two impact parameters on various types of flood damage were investigated in five communities affected by the Elbe catchment flood in Germany in 2002. 2-D hydraulic models with high to medium spatial resolutions were used to calculate the impact parameters at the sites in which damage occurred. A significant influence of flow velocity on structural damage, particularly on roads, could be shown in contrast to a minor influence on monetary losses and business interruption. Forecasts of structural damage to road infrastructure should be based on flow velocity alone. The energy head is suggested as a suitable flood impact parameter for reliable forecasting of structural damage to residential buildings above a critical impact level of 2 m of energy head or water depth. However, general consideration of flow velocity in flood damage modelling, particularly for estimating monetary loss, cannot be recommended.
引用
收藏
页码:1679 / 1692
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2002, NONSTR FLOOD PLAIN M
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2007, NAT HAZARDS REV, DOI [DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2007)8:4(97), 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2007)8:4(97)]
  • [3] Flood risk analyses-how detailed do we need to be?
    Apel, H.
    Aronica, G. T.
    Kreibich, H.
    Thieken, A. H.
    [J]. NATURAL HAZARDS, 2009, 49 (01) : 79 - 98
  • [4] Multilevel model for flood wave propagation in flood-affected areas
    Aronica, G
    Tucciarelli, T
    Nasello, C
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WATER RESOURCES PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 1998, 124 (04) : 210 - 217
  • [5] Drainage efficiency in urban areas: a case study
    Aronica, GT
    Lanza, LG
    [J]. HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2005, 19 (05) : 1105 - 1119
  • [6] A simple raster-based model for flood inundation simulation
    Bates, PD
    De Roo, APJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2000, 236 (1-2) : 54 - 77
  • [7] Black R. D., 1975, Floodproofing rural residences (Washington D.C. Report no EDA 77088). US Department of Commerce
  • [8] *BWG, 2001, SWISS FED OFF WAT GE
  • [9] CLAUSSEL L, 1990, DEV CRITERIA PREDICT
  • [10] *EDAC, 2008, DAM LOSS PRED MOD BA