Blindsided? - September 11 and the origins of strategic surprise

被引:34
作者
Parker, CF
Stern, EK
机构
[1] Uppsala Univ, Dept Govt, SE-75120 Uppsala, Sweden
[2] Swedish Natl Def Coll, Ctr Crisis Management Res & Training, SE-11593 Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
strategic surprise; policy failure; overvaluation; overconfidence; wishful thinking; bureaucratic politics; organizational process; threat politics; issue framing; agenda setting;
D O I
10.1111/0162-895X.00300
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
The devastating terror attacks of 11 September 2001 have often been characterized as a "bolt from the blue. " Drawing inspiration from the political psychological literature on strategic surprise, this article poses the deceptively simple question of why so many U.S. policymakers were caught so woefully off guard last year. Through a preliminary empirical exploration of three broad explanatory "cuts" derived from the relevant interdisciplinary literature psychological, bureau-organizational, and agenda-political-the authors seek to shed light on the sources of failure that may have contributed to 9/11 and point to promising avenues of investigation for future research as the available empirical record becomes more complete.
引用
收藏
页码:601 / 630
页数:30
相关论文
共 133 条
[1]  
Allison Graham., 1999, ESSENCE DECISION, VSecond
[2]  
ALLISON Graham T., 1971, Essence of decision: Explaining the Cuban missile crisis
[3]  
AMANAT A, 2001, AGE TERROR AM WORLD, V11, P23
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1997, DECISION MAKING WAR
[5]  
[Anonymous], INT STUD QUART S2, DOI DOI 10.2307/254411
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1988, SURPRISE ATTACK VICT
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1999, CRISIS DECISIONMAKIN
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2002, TERRORISM ASYMMETRIC
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2002, Washington Post
[10]  
[Anonymous], 1996, COUNTERFACTUAL THOUG