The effect of block scheduling high school mathematics courses on student achievement and teachers' use of time: implications for educational productivity

被引:14
作者
Rice, JK [1 ]
Croninger, RG
Roellke, CF
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Dept Educ Policy & Leadership, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[2] Vassar Coll, Dept Educ & Urban Studies, Poughkeepsie, NY 12604 USA
关键词
productivity; efficiency; resource allocation; scheduling;
D O I
10.1016/S0272-7757(01)00045-0
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Block scheduling involves the reallocation of instructional time into longer class sessions to encourage more active teaching strategies, reduce fragmentation inherent in single-period schedules, and improve student performance. To the degree that such policies reallocate existing resources to realize higher levels of desired educational outcomes, the goal of productivity can be served. Despite widespread experimentation with various forms of block scheduling. there is conflicting evidence on the impact of these innovations on student achievement, and little evidence of their effect on classroom practice. This study explores these relationships, More specifically, the study draws on data front the National Education Longitudinal Study: 1988 to estimate the impact of block-scheduled mathematics courses on tenth-grade student achievement and teachers' use of class time. Findings suggest that while block scheduling is positively associated with teachers' use of multiple instructional methods and more individualized instruction. this scheduling reform has a negative impact on students' tenth-grade mathematics scores, controlling for other factors. Implications for educational productivity are discussed. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:599 / 607
页数:9
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
*AIR, 1999, ED GUID SCHOOLW REF
[2]  
Bryk A.S., 1993, CATHOLIC SCH COMMON
[3]  
CAWELTI G, 1994, HIGH SCH RESTRUCTURI
[4]  
Darling-Hammond L., 1997, RIGHT LEARN BLUEPRIN
[5]  
KARWEIT N, 1984, EDUC LEADERSHIP, V41, P32
[6]  
Kramer S.L., 1997, National Association of Secondary School Principals, V81, P18, DOI [DOI 10.1177/019263659708158604, 10.1177/019263659708158604]
[7]  
KRAMER SL, 1997, NASSP B, V81, P69
[8]   Rethinking the allocation of teaching resources: Some lessons from high-performing schools [J].
Miles, KH ;
Darling-Hammond, L .
EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION AND POLICY ANALYSIS, 1998, 20 (01) :9-29
[9]  
MILES KH, 1994, EDUC EVAL POLICY AN, V17, P476
[10]  
National Commission onTime and Learning, 1994, PRIS TIM