Association of age, sex and deprivation with quality indicators for diabetes: population-based cross sectional survey in primary care

被引:17
作者
Gray, Jeremy
Millett, Christopher
O'Sullivan, Caoimhe
Omar, Rumana Z.
Majeed, Azeem
机构
[1] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci & Technol, Dept Primary Care & Social Med, Fac Med, London W6 8RP, England
[2] Wandsworth Primary Care Res Ctr, London SW11 6HN, England
[3] UCL Hosp, Res & Dev Directorate, Med Stat Unit, London WC1E 5DB, England
[4] UCL, Dept Stat Sci, London WC1E 6BT, England
关键词
D O I
10.1258/jrsm.99.11.576
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives To determine the quality of diabetes management in primary care after the publication of the National Service Framework and examine the impact of age, gender and deprivation on the achievement of established quality indicators. Design Population-based cross sectional survey using electronic general practice records carried out between June-October 2003. Setting Thirty-four practices in Wandsworth, South-West London, UK. Participants 6035 adult patients (>= 18 years) with diabetes from a total registered population of 201572 patients. Interventions None. Main outcome measures Success rates for the diabetes quality indicators within the General Medical Services contract for general practitioners. Results We identified large variations in diabetes management between general practitioner practices with poorer recording of quality care in younger patients (18-44 years). In addition, younger patients had a worse cholesterol and glycaemia profile, although hypertension was more common in older patients. Gender and deprivation did not appear to be important determinants of the quality of care received. Conclusions There are large variations in diabetes management between general practitioner practices, with care seemingly worse for younger adults. Longitudinal studies are required to determine whether current UK quality improvement initiatives have been successful in attenuating existing variations in care and treatment outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:576 / 581
页数:6
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[2]   Inequalities in glycaemic control in patients with Type 2 diabetes in primary care [J].
Bebb, C ;
Kendrick, D ;
Stewart, J ;
Coupland, C ;
Madeley, R ;
Brown, K ;
Burden, R ;
Sturrock, N .
DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2005, 22 (10) :1364-1371
[3]   Association among individual deprivation, glycemic control and diabetes complications -: The EPICES score [J].
Bihan, H ;
Laurent, S ;
Sass, C ;
Nguyen, G ;
Huot, C ;
Moulin, JJ ;
Guegen, R ;
Le Toumelin, P ;
Le Clésiau, H ;
La Rosa, E ;
Reach, G ;
Cohen, R .
DIABETES CARE, 2005, 28 (11) :2680-2685
[4]   Improvements in quality of clinical care in English general practice 1998-2003: longitudinal observational study [J].
Campbell, SM ;
Roland, MO ;
Middleton, E ;
Reeves, D .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2005, 331 (7525) :1121-1123
[5]  
Chaturvedi N, 1998, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V316, P100
[6]  
DOH, 2001, NAT SERV FRAM OLD PE
[7]   Patient characteristics do not predict poor glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes patients treated in primary care [J].
Goudswaard A.N. ;
Stolk R.P. ;
Zuithoff P. ;
Rutten G.E.H.M. .
European Journal of Epidemiology, 2004, 19 (6) :541-545
[8]   Use of Read codes in diabetes management in a south London primary care group: implications for establishing disease registers [J].
Gray, J ;
Orr, D ;
Majeed, A .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2003, 326 (7399) :1130-1132A
[9]  
Harris M, 1995, DIABETES AM
[10]  
Health and Social Care Information Centre, NAT DIAB AUD