Patient-reported quality of life after abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery: A prospective comparison of endovascular and open repair

被引:61
作者
Aljabri, Badr [1 ]
Al Wahaibi, Khalifa [1 ]
Abner, Deborah [1 ]
Mackenzie, Kent S. [1 ]
Corriveau, Marc-Michel [1 ]
Obrand, Daniel I. [1 ]
Meshefedjian, Garbis [1 ]
Steinmetz, Oren K. [1 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Royal Victoria Hosp, Div Vasc Surg, Montreal, PQ H3A 1A1, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.jvs.2006.08.015
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: This study evaluated and compared changes over time in health-related quality of life reported by patients with infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) undergoing elective endovascular (EVAR) and open aneurysm (OR) repair. Methods. A prospective, nonrandomized cohort of 76 patients (62 men, 14 women; age range, 42 to 89 years) undergoing elective, infrarenal AAA repair (EVAR, n = 43; OR, n = 33) at two university teaching hospitals during a 15-month period were administered the Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 36-item (SF-36) health survey preoperatively and then 1 week, 1 month, and 6 months postoperatively. Patient demographics, procedural details, postoperative follow-up data, and SF-36 scores were compared between groups. Results. Both groups had total SF-36 scores that were significantly lower than preoperative scores at 1 week and I month after surgery but were not significantly different from the preoperative scores at 6 months (OR 66.2 +/- 21.1 to 72.3 +/- 19.8, P >. 1; and EVAR 61.0 +/- 17.7 to 58.7 +/- 19.4, P > .1). Six-month total SF-36 scores were significantly higher in the OR group compared with the EVAR group (mean 72.3 +/- 19.8 OR vs 58.7 +/- 19.4 EVAR,- P = .009). In the postoperative period, a significant drop occurred in mean scores in six of the eight domains of the SF-36 in the OR patients (physical function, PF; role physical, RP; bodily pain, BP; vitality, VT; social function, SF; role emotional, RE) and five domains for EVAR patients (PF, RP, BP, SF, RE). In two domains, RE and PF, scores returned to baseline values significantly sooner in EVAR patients than in OR patients (RE, EVAR 1 month vs OR 6 months; and PF, EVAR 1 month vs OR 6 months). In the VT domain, no significant postoperative drop occurred in the EVAR group, but in the OR group, mean scores were significantly lower at 1 week and 1 month compared with preoperative values. In the domains of general health and mental health, no significant drop occurred in SF-36 score postoperatively in either group. Conclusions. Patient reported health-related quality of life after infrarenal AAA repair is significantly impaired in the early postoperative period but returns to baseline by 6 months in patients treated with EVAR and OR. Patients having EVAR had significantly more rapid return to preoperative scores in selected domains of the SF-36. Even though EVAR is associated with shorter and less invasive perioperative hospital course and fewer postoperative complications, EVAR patients had lower quality of life scores 6 months after surgery than OR patients.
引用
收藏
页码:1182 / 1187
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Aquino RV, 2001, J ENDOVASC THER, V8, P521, DOI 10.1583/1545-1550(2001)008<0521:QOLAIP>2.0.CO
  • [2] 2
  • [3] Two-year outcomes after conventional or endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms
    Blankensteijn, JD
    de Jong, SECA
    Prinssen, M
    van der Ham, AC
    Buth, J
    van Sterkenburg, SMM
    Verhagen, HJM
    Buskens, E
    Grobbee, DE
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2005, 352 (23) : 2398 - 2405
  • [4] Quality of life analysis in patients with lower limb ischaemia: Suggestions for European standardisation
    Chetter, IC
    Spark, JI
    Dolan, P
    Scott, DJA
    Kester, RC
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 1997, 13 (06) : 597 - 604
  • [5] Forbes JF, 1998, LANCET, V352, P1656
  • [6] QUALITY-OF-LIFE MEASUREMENT IN SURGICAL PRACTICE
    FRASER, SCA
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1993, 80 (02) : 163 - 169
  • [7] Endovascular aneurysm repair versus open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 1): randomised controlled trial
    Greenhalgh, RM
    Brown, LC
    Epstein, D
    Kwong, GPS
    Powell, JT
    Sculpher, MJ
    Thompson, SG
    [J]. LANCET, 2005, 365 (9478) : 2179 - 2186
  • [8] Midterm durability of abdominal aortic aneurysm endograft repair:: A word of caution
    Hölzenbein, TJ
    Kretschmer, G
    Thurnher, S
    Schoder, M
    Aslim, E
    Lammer, J
    Polterauer, P
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2001, 33 (02) : S46 - S54
  • [9] Need for secondary interventions after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Intermediate-term follow-up results of a European collaborative registry (EUROSTAR)
    Laheij, RJF
    Buth, J
    Harris, PL
    Moll, FL
    Stelter, WJ
    Verhoeven, ELG
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2000, 87 (12) : 1666 - 1673
  • [10] Comparison of cognitive function and quality of life after endovascular or conventional aortic aneurysm repair
    Lloyd, AJ
    Boyle, J
    Bell, PRF
    Thompson, MM
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2000, 87 (04) : 443 - 447