Comparing contents of functional outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health

被引:82
作者
Schepers, V. P. M.
Ketelaar, M.
van de Port, I. G. L.
Visser-Meily, J. M. A.
Lindeman, E.
机构
[1] Rehabil Ctr Hoogstr, Ctr Excellence Rehabil Med, NL-3583 TM Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Rudolf Magnus Inst Neurosci, Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
rehabilitation outcome; outcome measures; outcome assessment; stroke; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; SURVEY SF-36; ISSUES; ICF; SELECTION; RELIABILITY; MEDICINE; VALIDITY; BALANCE; PROFILE;
D O I
10.1080/09638280600756257
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Purpose. To examine the content of outcome measures that are frequently used in stroke rehabilitation and focus on activities and participation, by linking them to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Method. Constructs of the following instruments were linked to the ICF: Barthel Index, Berg Balance Scale, Chedoke McMaster Stroke Assessment Scale, Euroqol-5D, Functional Independence Measure, Frenchay Activities Index, Nottingham Health Profile, Rankin Scale, Rivermead Motor Assessment, Rivermead Mobility Index, Stroke Adapted Sickness Impact Profile 30, Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36, Stroke Impact Scale, Stroke Specific Quality of Life Scale and Timed Up and Go test. Results. It proved possible to link most constructs to the ICF. Most constructs fitted into the activities and participation component, with mobility being the category most frequently covered in the instruments. Although instruments were selected on the basis of their focus on activities and participation, 27% of the constructs addressed categories of body functions. Approximately 10% of the constructs could not be linked. Conclusions. The ICF is a useful tool to examine and compare contents of instruments in stroke rehabilitation. This content comparison should enable clinicians and researchers to choose the measure that best matches the area of their interest.
引用
收藏
页码:221 / 230
页数:10
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
Adams SA, 1997, CLIN REHABIL, V11, P52, DOI 10.1177/026921559701100108
[2]  
BERG K, 1995, SCAND J REHABIL MED, V27, P27
[3]  
BERG KO, 1992, CAN J PUBLIC HEALTH, V83, pS7
[4]   Evaluation of measures used to assess quality of life after stroke [J].
Buck, D ;
Jacoby, A ;
Massey, A ;
Ford, G .
STROKE, 2000, 31 (08) :2004-2010
[5]   Linking health-status measurements to the international classification of functioning, disability and health [J].
Cieza, A ;
Brockow, T ;
Ewert, T ;
Amman, E ;
Kollerits, B ;
Chatterji, S ;
Üstün, TB ;
Stucki, G .
JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2002, 34 (05) :205-210
[6]   The tools of disability outcomes research functional status measures [J].
Cohen, ME ;
Marino, RJ .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2000, 81 (12) :S21-S29
[7]  
Collen F M, 1991, Int Disabil Stud, V13, P50
[8]  
de Haan R J, 2002, Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd, V146, P606
[9]   MEASURING QUALITY-OF-LIFE IN STROKE [J].
DEHAAN, R ;
AARONSON, N ;
LIMBURG, M ;
HEWER, RL ;
VANCREVEL, H .
STROKE, 1993, 24 (02) :320-327
[10]   THE CLINICAL MEANING OF RANKIN HANDICAP GRADES AFTER STROKE [J].
DEHAAN, R ;
LIMBURG, M ;
BOSSUYT, P ;
VANDERMEULEN, J ;
AARONSON, N .
STROKE, 1995, 26 (11) :2027-2030