Decision making of oil spill contingency options with fuzzy comprehensive evaluation

被引:30
作者
Liu, X. [1 ]
Wirtz, K. W.
机构
[1] Carl von Ossietzky Univ Oldenburg, ICBM, D-26111 Oldenburg, Germany
[2] GKSS Forschungszentrum Geesthacht GmbH, Inst Coastal Res, D-21501 Geesthacht, Germany
关键词
decision making; oil spill; fuzzy comprehensive evaluation; multi-criteria; group consensus;
D O I
10.1007/s11269-006-9031-5
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Accidental oil spills are one of major sources to affect ecologically and economically sensitive marine areas and shorelines. The aim of decision making during oil spill response management is to minimize pollution effects in coastal areas, once spills occur. However, not all coastal areas at risk can be saved due to a limitation of equipments or options. Thus, often preferences between different coastal areas or uses, respectively, have to be made in an operational way. Such a management issue is here taken as a multi-group multi-criteria decision making problem involving a variety of stakeholders and natural dynamic environments. For solving such a complex problem, this paper targets efforts to integrate a second order fuzzy comprehensive evaluation (FCE) method and consensus facilitating techniques into computerized group decision support system. Such a DSS takes into account the influence of multiple criteria and the knowledge of different interested groups and simulates a consensus based decision process. Through a case study of the Prestige accident off the Spanish coast in 2002, it is demonstrated that the model provides a simple, effective and adaptable method to solve operational management problems related to complex human nature interactions as realized during oil spill management. Moreover, a series of analyses explore potentials and limitations of the FCE for further applications in the field of multi-group multi-criteria decision-making.
引用
收藏
页码:663 / 676
页数:14
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
AAMO OM, 1997, P 20 ARCT MAR OIL SP
[2]  
[Anonymous], RIGHT PLACE SHARED R
[3]  
CARLSSON C, 1999, P 32 HAW INT C SYST
[4]   Breaking up is hard to do [J].
Graham-Rowe, D .
NATURE, 2004, 429 (6994) :800-802
[5]   Multiple criteria decision making - A case study of the Columbia River salmon recovery plan [J].
Gurocak, ER ;
Whittlesey, NK .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 1998, 12 (04) :479-495
[6]   Optimal tolerance allocation based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation and genetic algorithm [J].
Ji, S ;
Li, X ;
Ma, Y ;
Cai, H .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2000, 16 (07) :461-468
[7]   Tolerance synthesis using second-order fuzzy comprehensive evaluation and genetic algorithm [J].
Ji, SP ;
Li, XL ;
Du, R .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2000, 38 (15) :3471-3483
[8]   Using multicriteria methods in environmental planning and management [J].
Lahdelma, R ;
Salminen, P ;
Hokkanen, J .
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2000, 26 (06) :595-605
[9]  
Liu S., 2001, IT Professional, V3, P27, DOI 10.1109/6294.899930
[10]   CHOICE OF A LONG-TERM STRATEGY FOR THE NATIONAL ELECTRICITY SUPPLY VIA SCENARIO ANALYSIS AND MULTICRITERIA ANALYSIS [J].
LOOTSMA, FA ;
BOONEKAMP, PGM ;
COOKE, RM ;
VANOOSTVOORN, F .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1990, 48 (02) :189-203