The sensitivity, specificity, and reliability of radiographic periapical diagnosis of posterior teeth

被引:16
作者
Bohay, RN [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Western Ontario, Sch Dent, Fac Med & Dent, London, ON N6A 5C1, Canada
[2] Univ Western Ontario, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, London, ON N6A 5C1, Canada
来源
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTICS | 2000年 / 89卷 / 05期
关键词
D O I
10.1067/moe.2000.105908
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 [口腔医学];
摘要
Purpose. The purpose of this study was to define the percent accuracy sensitivity, specificity, and reliability of periapical radiographic diagnosis of periapical inflammatory disease. Method, A total of 140 cases were reviewed under ideal viewing conditions by 6 observers. For each case, observers determined whether periapical disease was evident and rated the confidence of their interpretation. Results, The mean percent accuracy was 70.2%. The mean sensitivity and specificity were 0.65 and 0.78, respectively. The intraclass correlation coefficients for intraobserver and interobserver reliability were 0.66 and 0.54, respectively. Conclusion, Specificity of periapical radiographic diagnosis is higher than sensitivity. These results support the current guideline for selective use of periapical views based on patient symptoms and clinical signs. Finally, dentists have a good degree of reliability on repeated evaluations, but only fair agreement when compared with other dentists reading the same radiograph.
引用
收藏
页码:639 / 642
页数:4
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]
MEASURING OBSERVER PERFORMANCE BY ROC ANALYSIS - INDICATIONS AND COMPLICATIONS [J].
BERBAUM, KS ;
DORFMAN, DD ;
FRANKEN, EA .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 1989, 24 (03) :228-233
[2]
SURVEY OF RADIOGRAPHIC PRACTICES OF GENERAL DENTISTS FOR THE DENTATE ADULT PATIENT [J].
BOHAY, RN ;
STEPHENS, RG ;
KOGON, SL .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTICS, 1995, 79 (04) :526-531
[3]
VARIATIONS IN INTERPRETATION OF PERIAPICAL RADIOLUCENCIES [J].
DUINKERKE, ASH ;
VANDEPOEL, ACM ;
DEBOO, T ;
DOESBURG, WH .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTICS, 1975, 40 (03) :414-422
[4]
Fleiss J. L., 1986, DESIGN ANAL CLIN EXP, DOI DOI 10.1002/9781118032923
[5]
FLETCHER R. H., 1988, CLIN EPIDEMIOLOGY ES, V2th
[6]
RELIABILITY OF RADIOGRAPHICAL INTERPRETATIONS [J].
GELFAND, M ;
SUNDERMAN, EJ ;
GOLDMAN, M .
JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 1983, 9 (02) :71-75
[7]
RELIABILITY OF RADIOGRAPHIC INTERPRETATIONS [J].
GOLDMAN, M ;
PEARSON, AH ;
DARZENTA, N .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTICS, 1974, 38 (02) :287-293
[8]
A CLINICAL COMPARISON OF XERORADIOGRAPHY AND CONVENTIONAL FILM FOR THE INTERPRETATION OF PERIAPICAL STRUCTURES [J].
GRATT, BM ;
WHITE, SC ;
LUCATORTO, FM ;
SAPP, JP ;
KAFFE, I .
JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 1986, 12 (08) :346-351
[9]
MEASUREMENT OF OBSERVER AGREEMENT FOR CATEGORICAL DATA [J].
LANDIS, JR ;
KOCH, GG .
BIOMETRICS, 1977, 33 (01) :159-174
[10]
Mol A, 1992, Dentomaxillofac Radiol, V21, P190