Delaying the primary surgical effort for advanced ovarian cancer: A systematic review of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and interval cytoreduction

被引:149
作者
Bristow, Robert E.
Eisenhauer, Eric L.
Santillan, Antonio
Chi, Dennis S.
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Med Inst, Sidney Kimmel Comprehens Canc Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Kelly Gynecol Oncol Serv, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Med Inst, Sidney Kimmel Comprehens Canc Ctr, Dept Oncol, Kelly Gynecol Oncol Serv, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
[3] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Surg, Gynecol Serv, New York, NY 10021 USA
关键词
ovarian cancer; neoadjuvant chemotherapy; interval cytoreduction;
D O I
10.1016/j.ygyno.2006.11.002
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective. To summarize the existing data on interval cytoreductive surgery and neoadjuvant chemotherapy as alternative treatment strategies for patients with advanced-stage ovarian cancer. Methods. All investigational studies with evaluable survival data on interval cytoreductive surgery and neoadjuvant chemotherapy for ovarian cancer reported in the English language literature between 1989 and 2006 were systematically reviewed. Results. Three randomized trials and six non-randomized studies of interval cytoreduction following suboptimal initial surgery were identified. Twenty-six studies, including a total of 1336 patients, reporting on neoadjuvant chemotherapy administered in lieu of primary cytoreductive surgery were analyzed according to the survival outcome achieved, the degree of surgical effort or success, and the particular selection criteria employed to justify deferring an attempt at primary cytoreductive surgery. Conclusions. Interval surgery following a concerted but suboptimal attempt at up-front cytoreduction does not appear to have an appreciable impact on survival outcome. Maximal primary cytoreductive surgery remains the standard of care for the majority of women with suspected advanced ovarian cancer. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy represents a viable alternative management strategy for the limited number of patients felt to be optimally unresectable by an experienced ovarian cancer surgical team; however, currently available data suggest that the survival outcome achievable with initial chemotherapy is inferior to successful up-front cytoreductive surgery. Additional research is needed to devise universal selection criteria for neoadjuvant chemotherapy, determine the most efficacious treatment program, and characterize the appropriate proportion of patients in which an attempt at primary surgery should be abandoned in favor of initial chemotherapy. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:480 / 490
页数:11
相关论文
共 74 条
[1]   Aggressive surgical effort and improved survival in advanced-stage ovarian cancer [J].
Aletti, GD ;
Dowdy, SC ;
Gostout, BS ;
Jones, MB ;
Stanhope, CR ;
Wilson, TO ;
Podratz, KC ;
Cliby, WA .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 107 (01) :77-85
[2]   Diagnostic open laparoscopy in the management of advanced ovarian cancer [J].
Angioli, R ;
Palaia, I ;
Zullo, MA ;
Muzii, L ;
Manci, N ;
Calcagno, M ;
Panici, PB .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2006, 100 (03) :455-461
[3]  
Ansquer Y, 2001, CANCER, V91, P2329, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(20010615)91:12<2329::AID-CNCR1265>3.0.CO
[4]  
2-U
[5]   Intraperitoneal cisplatin and paclitaxel in ovarian cancer [J].
Armstrong, DK ;
Bundy, B ;
Wenzel, L ;
Huang, HQ ;
Baergen, R ;
Lele, S ;
Copeland, LJ ;
Walker, JL ;
Burger, RA .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2006, 354 (01) :34-43
[6]   Prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy by sequential F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in patients with advanced-stage ovarian cancer [J].
Avril, N ;
Sassen, S ;
Schmalfeldt, B ;
Naehrig, J ;
Rutke, S ;
Weber, WA ;
Werner, M ;
Graeff, H ;
Schwaiger, M ;
Kuhn, W .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 23 (30) :7445-7453
[7]  
AXTELL A, 2006, SOC GYNEC ONC ANN M
[8]   The potential role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced ovarian cancer [J].
Baekelandt, M .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2003, 13 :163-168
[9]  
Bristow RE, 2000, CANCER, V89, P1532, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(20001001)89:7<1532::AID-CNCR17>3.0.CO
[10]  
2-A