Personal income inequality and aggregate demand

被引:95
作者
Carvalho, Laura [1 ]
Rezai, Armon [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, BR-05508 Sao Paulo, Brazil
[2] Vienna Univ Econ & Business, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
[3] IIASA, Vienna, Austria
关键词
Income inequality; Demand regimes; Neo-Kaleckian model; Personal and functional income distribution; C32; D31; D33; E25; MONETARY-POLICY; MODEL; LABOR; WAGE;
D O I
10.1093/cje/beu085
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper presents a theoretical and empirical investigation of how changes in the size distribution of income can affect aggregate demand and the demand regime of an economy. After presenting empirical evidence for the US economy that the propensity to save increases significantly from the bottom to the top quintile of wage earners, we demonstrate that more equal distributions always lead to higher output in the traditional neo-Kaleckian macroeconomic model. We also present conditions under which a reduction of income inequality among workers results in demand becoming more wage led. This view is supported by the results of an econometric study for the USA (1967-2010), which show that the rise after 1980 in income inequality has made the US economy more profit led.
引用
收藏
页码:491 / 505
页数:15
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], EC SURPLUS ADV EC
[2]  
Barbosa-Filho N.H., 2006, Metroeconomic, V57, P389, DOI [DOI 10.1111/J.1467-999X.2006.00250.X, 10.1111/j.1467-999X.2006.00250.x]
[3]   UNEMPLOYMENT AND THE REAL WAGE - THE ECONOMIC-BASIS FOR CONTESTING POLITICAL IDEOLOGIES [J].
BHADURI, A ;
MARGLIN, S .
CAMBRIDGE JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1990, 14 (04) :375-393
[4]  
Bowles S., 1995, Macroeconomic policy after the conservative era
[5]  
Chiarella C., 2006, QUANTITATIVE EMPIRIC, V277
[6]  
DUTT AK, 1984, CAMBRIDGE J ECON, V8, P25
[7]  
Dutt Amitava., 2006, METROECONOMICA, V57, P339, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-999X.2006.00246.x, DOI 10.1111/J.1467-999X.2006.00246.X]
[8]  
Ederer S., 2007, Money, Distribution and Economic Policy--Alternatives to Orthodox Macroeconomics, P119
[9]  
Franke R., 2006, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, V17, P452, DOI 10.1016/j.strueco.2006.08.001
[10]  
Goodwin R., 1967, Socialism, Capitalism and Economic Growth, P54