Tax progressivity and state economic performance

被引:5
作者
Chernick, H [1 ]
机构
[1] CUNY,GRAD CTR,NEW YORK,NY
关键词
D O I
10.1177/089124249701100308
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Principles of fiscal federalism suggest that subnational units of government should rely an benefits-received financing, implying regressivity in state and local taxes. Empirically, however stares and their localities vary enormously in the degree of progressivity of their tar systems. This article investigates the effect of tax progressivity on economic growth. Using a pooled cross-section model from 1977 to 1993, the author found that the degree of progressivity has no effect on the rate of growth of state personal income per capita. Measuring growth rates over the entire period the author found that progressivity has a significant negative effect on economic growth. The long-period result is driven by the high growth rates of a small number of northeastern states, who benefited from strong regional growth and their tar haven status adjacent to more progressive states. The weak progressivity effect suggests that there is considerable scope for differences in tax incidence across states.
引用
收藏
页码:249 / 267
页数:19
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]  
*ADV COMM FISC FED, SIGN FEAT FISC FED
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1989, PUBLIC FINANCE THEOR
[3]  
[Anonymous], BROOKINGS PAPERS EC, DOI DOI 10.2307/2534556
[4]  
[Anonymous], BROOKINGS PAPERS EC, DOI [10.2307/2534639, DOI 10.2307/2534639]
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1995, The Economic Report of the President Transmitted to the Congress, Together with a Report to the President
[6]  
BAHL R, 1997, STATE LOCAL GOVT CHO
[7]  
Bartik T. J., 1991, WHO BENEFITS STATE L
[8]  
Bartik TJ, 1996, GROWING STATE EC TAX
[9]  
BESLEY T, 1995, AM ECON REV, V85, P25
[10]   PROBLEMS WITH INSTRUMENTAL VARIABLES ESTIMATION WHEN THE CORRELATION BETWEEN THE INSTRUMENTS AND THE ENDOGENOUS EXPLANATORY VARIABLE IS WEAK [J].
BOUND, J ;
JAEGER, DA ;
BAKER, RM .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1995, 90 (430) :443-450