Decreased fluid volume to reduce organ damage: A new approach to burn shock resuscitation? A preliminary study

被引:86
作者
Arlati, S. [1 ]
Storti, E. [1 ]
Pradella, V. [1 ]
Bucci, L. [1 ]
Vitolo, A. [1 ]
Pulici, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Osped Niguarda Ca Granda, Intens Care Unit G Bozza, I-20162 Milan, Italy
关键词
burn injury; shock; resuscitation; fluid therapy; haemodynamics;
D O I
10.1016/j.resuscitation.2006.07.010
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the impact of decreased fluid resuscitation on multipleorgan dysfunction after severe burns. This approach was referred to as "permissive hypovotaemia". Methods: Two cohorts of patients with burns > 20% BSA without associated injuries and admitted to ICU within 6h from the thermal injury were compared. Patients were matched for both age and burn severity. The multiple-organ dysfunction score (MODS) by Marshall was calculated for 10 days after ICU admission. Permissive hypovotaemia was administered by a haemodynamic-oriented approach throughout the first 24-h period. Haemodynamic variables, arterial blood lactates and net fluid balance were obtained throughout the first 48 h. Results: Twenty-four patients were enrolled: twelve of them received the Parkland Formula while twelve were resuscitated according to the permissive hypovolaemic approach. Permissive hypovolaemia allowed for Less volume infusion (3.2 +/- 0.7 ml/kg/% burn versus 4.6 +/- 0.3 mt/kg/% burn; P < 0.001), a reduced positive fluid balance (+7.5 +/- 5.4 l/day versus +12 +/- 4.7 l/day; P < 0.05) and significantly lesser MODS Score values (P= 0.003) than the Parkland Formula. Both haemodynamic variables and arterial blood Lactate levels were comparable between the patient cohorts throughout the resuscitation period. Conclusions: Permissive hypovolaemia seems safe and well tolerated by burn patients. Moreover, it seems effective in reducing multiple-organ dysfunction as induced by oedema fluid accumulation and inadequate O-2 tissue utilization. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:371 / 378
页数:8
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
*AM BURN ASS, 2001, J BURN CARE REHABIL, V22, pS48
[2]  
*AM BURN ASS, 2001, J BURN CARE REHABIL, V22, P275
[3]  
ARTURSON G, 1979, ACTA PHYSIOL SCAND, P111
[4]  
Barton Richard G., 1997, Journal of Burn Care and Rehabilitation, V18, P1, DOI 10.1097/00004630-199701000-00001
[5]  
Baxter C R, 1974, Clin Plast Surg, V1, P693
[6]   PHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSE TO CRYSTALLOID RESUSCITATION OF SEVERE BURNS [J].
BAXTER, CR ;
SHIRES, T .
ANNALS OF THE NEW YORK ACADEMY OF SCIENCES, 1968, 150 (A3) :874-&
[7]  
BAXTER CR, 1978, SURG CLIN N AM, V58, P1313
[8]   ADEQUATE RESUSCITATION OF BURN PATIENTS MAY NOT BE MEASURED BY URINE OUTPUT AND VITAL SIGNS [J].
DRIES, DJ ;
WAXMAN, K .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1991, 19 (03) :327-329
[9]   Central venous pressure, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure and intrathoracic blood volumes as preload indicators in cardiac surgery patients [J].
Godje, O ;
Peyerl, M ;
Seebauer, T ;
Lamm, P ;
Mair, H ;
Reichart, B .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 1998, 13 (05) :533-539
[10]   Continuous cardiac output by femoral arterial thermodilution calibrated pulse contour analysis: Comparison with pulmonary arterial thermodilution [J].
Goedje, O ;
Hoeke, K ;
Lichtwarck-Aschoff, M ;
Faltchauser, A ;
Lamm, P ;
Reichart, B .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1999, 27 (11) :2407-2412