Use of flow cytometry (Sysmex® UF-100) to screen for positive urine cultures: in search for the ideal cut-off

被引:38
作者
Brilha, Sara [1 ]
Proenca, Helena [1 ]
Cristino, Jose Melo [1 ]
Haenscheid, Thomas [1 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Hosp Lisboa Norte, Microbiol Lab, Serv Patol Clin, P-1649028 Lisbon, Portugal
关键词
flow cytometric screening; Sysmex (R) UF-100; urine culture; SIGNIFICANT BACTERIURIA; TRACT INFECTIONS; MICROSCOPY; AUTOMATION; DIAGNOSIS; STRIPS; TESTS;
D O I
10.1515/CCLM.2010.047
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background: Cultures for urinary tract infections (UTI) constitute a large workload in the clinical microbiology laboratory, although up to 80% are usually negative. Several automated methods are available to screen urines for UTI, one being the flow cytometry-based Sysmex (R) UF-100. Methods: The performance of the UF-100 was evaluated over a 16-month period using urine culture as the reference method. Results: During this period, a total of 5356 urine samples were studied (469 children; 3229 women and 1658 men), of which 706 were culture positive (593 grew Gram negative bacilli). Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis showed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.83 for leukocytes and 0.85 for bacterial count. Applying cut-off values reported in the literature gave sensitivities ranging from 75% to 90%, resulting in 73-174 false negatives (FN). Using a logical combination (leukocytes >= 15 x 10(6)/L OR bacteria >= 500 x 10(6)/L) gave a sensitivity of 98%. However, the specificity dropped to 25%, resulting in 15 FN. Conclusions: Screening urine samples for UTI detects a large number of culture positive samples. However, the rather large number of FN observed precludes the use of the UF-100 as a routine screening method to exclude urine samples from culture. Clin Chem Lab Med 2010;48: 289-92.
引用
收藏
页码:289 / 292
页数:4
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
BEMERZA J, 1998, CLIN CHEM, V44, P92
[2]  
*CLSI, 2001, GP16A3 CLSI
[3]  
DEINDOERFER FH, 1985, CLIN CHEM, V31, P1491
[4]   Testing by Sysmex UF-100 flow cytometer and with bacterial culture in a diagnostic laboratory: a comparison [J].
Evans, R. ;
Davidson, M. M. ;
Sim, L. R. W. ;
Hay, A. J. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2006, 59 (06) :661-662
[5]   The automation of sediment urinalysis using a new urine flow cytometer (UF-100™) [J].
Fenili, D ;
Pirovano, B .
CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE, 1998, 36 (12) :909-917
[6]   Automation of urine sediment examination: A comparison of the sysmex UF-100 automated flow cytometer with routine manual diagnosis (microscopy, test strips, and bacterial culture) [J].
Hannemann-Pohl, K ;
Kampf, SC .
CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE, 1999, 37 (07) :753-764
[7]   INABILITY OF THE CHEMSTRIP LN COMPARED WITH QUANTITATIVE URINE CULTURE TO PREDICT SIGNIFICANT BACTERIURIA [J].
JONES, C ;
MACPHERSON, DW ;
STEVENS, DL .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1986, 23 (01) :160-162
[8]  
KEIJZER M, 1997, SYSMEX J INT, V7, P117
[9]   Evaluation of the sysmex UF-100 urine cell Analyzer as a screening test to reduce the need for urine cultures for community-acquired urinary tract unfection [J].
Kim, Shine Young ;
Kim, Young Jin ;
Lee, Sun Min ;
Hwang, Sang Hyun ;
Kim, Hyung Hoi ;
Son, Han Chut ;
Lee, Eun Yup .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2007, 128 (06) :922-925
[10]   ANALYSES OF THE FLASHTRACK DNA PROBE AND UTISCREEN BIOLUMINESCENCE TESTS FOR BACTERIURIA [J].
KOENIG, C ;
TICK, LJ ;
HANNA, BA .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1992, 30 (02) :342-345