Release of methacrylic acid from dental composites

被引:53
作者
Yap, AUJ
Lee, HK
Sabapathy, R
机构
[1] Natl Univ Singapore, Fac Dent, Dept Restorat Dent, Singapore 119074, Singapore
[2] Natl Univ Singapore, Fac Engn, Ctr Biomed Mat Applicat & Technol, Singapore 119074, Singapore
[3] Natl Univ Singapore, Fac Sci, Dept Chem, Singapore 119074, Singapore
关键词
dental material; composite resin; methacrylic acid; release; capillary electrophoresis;
D O I
10.1016/S0109-5641(00)00004-X
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the release of methacrylic acid from four commercial dental composite restoratives (Silux plus (3M), Z100 (3M), Ariston pHc (Vivadent) and Surefil (Dentsply)). Methods: Three specimen disks (10 (0.2) mm in diameter and 2 (0.2) mm thick), were prepared for each material using custom-made molds. Each disk was placed in artificial saliva for 24 h at 37 degrees C, rinsed and subsequently immersed in 1.5 ml of deionised water in an airtight glass container. The container was continuously shaken at a speed of 80 rpm for 24 h at 37 degrees C in an orbital incubator. After 24 h (Day 1), the water was removed and analyzed. The specimen disk was then re-immersed into another 1.5 mi of fresh deionised water. The procedure of removing and refilling of the water was repeated for a total of 7 days. The sample solutions were filtered and injected into the capillary electrophoresis system for analysis immediately after collection. Statistical analysis was performed by ANOVA and Scheffe's test. Results: For Days 1-7, methacrylic acid released in water at 37 degrees C by Ariston was significantly greater than that of the other composites. Ranking from least to greatest total (cumulative over 7 days) methacrylic acid release was as follows: Z100 (5.66 ppm) < Silux (8.81 ppm) < Surefil (20.21 ppm) < Ariston (519.04 ppm), Methacrylic acid release was greatest at Day 1 for ail materials and generally decreased with time. Significance: Some composites may release high levels of methacrylic acid. The biological effects of such high levels of methacrylic acid is not known and warrant further in vivo and in vitro investigations. (C) 2000 Academy of Dental Materials. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:172 / 179
页数:8
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
BAKER DR, 1995, CAPILLARY ELECTROPHO, V11
[2]  
Bayne S C, 1992, Adv Dent Res, V6, P65
[3]   ANALYSIS OF AQUEOUS EXTRACT FROM FILLED RESINS [J].
BRADEN, M ;
PEARSON, GJ .
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 1981, 9 (02) :141-143
[4]  
Combe E C, 1998, Dent Update, V25, P411
[5]  
DRAUGHN RA, 1985, RESTORATIVE DENT MAT, P75
[6]   ELUTION OF LEACHABLE COMPONENTS FROM COMPOSITES [J].
FERRACANE, JL .
JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 1994, 21 (04) :441-452
[7]   CURRENT TRENDS IN DENTAL COMPOSITES [J].
FERRACANE, JL .
CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ORAL BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 1995, 6 (04) :302-318
[8]   RATE OF ELUTION OF LEACHABLE COMPONENTS FROM COMPOSITE [J].
FERRACANE, JL ;
CONDON, JR .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 1990, 6 (04) :282-287
[9]  
FREUND M, 1990, SCAND J DENT RES, V98, P351
[10]   RESIDUAL MONOMER (BIS-GMA) OF COMPOSITE RESINS [J].
INOUE, K ;
HAYASHI, I .
JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 1982, 9 (06) :493-497