A fuzzy clustering methodology for linguistic opinions in group decision making

被引:34
作者
Chakraborty, Chandan [1 ]
Chakraborty, Debjani [1 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Technol, Dept Math, Kharagpur 721302, W Bengal, India
关键词
linguistic opinion; fuzzy number; fuzzy distance; fuzzy clustering technique; OWA operator;
D O I
10.1016/j.asoc.2006.02.006
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The objective of this paper is to automate a decision-aid tool, which provides homogeneous clusters from a set of heterogeneous opinions for a particular criterion to evaluate an item under group decision scheme. In such situation, decision-making by a group of experts becomes more realistic and consistent while they provide more or less homogeneous responses. But in real practice, the homogeneity among the opinions for a specific criterion to evaluate an item is not maintained due to the diversity among the experts' several cognitive factors as well as biasness. As a result, the group's overall effectiveness is suffered and making a true decision becomes difficult as well as sometimes confusing. In order to avoid the heterogeneity among the opinions ( fuzzy numbers), we propose here a fuzzy clustering methodology based on a fuzzy distance measure. Also a ranking index is introduced on the basis of Ordered Weighted Average ( OWA) operator. Finally, a fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making problem on a flight simulator software development project is considered here to employ the proposed technique. The results are discussed and compared. (c) 2006 Elsevier B. V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:858 / 869
页数:12
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   Analysis and efficient implementation of a linguistic fuzzy C-means [J].
Auephanwiriyakul, S ;
Keller, JM .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2002, 10 (05) :563-582
[2]   COMBINATION OF FUZZY NUMBERS REPRESENTING EXPERT OPINIONS [J].
BARDOSSY, A ;
DUCKSTEIN, L ;
BOGARDI, I .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1993, 57 (02) :173-181
[3]  
Bezdek J. C., 1981, Pattern recognition with fuzzy objective function algorithms
[4]   A theoretical development on a fuzzy distance measure for fuzzy numbers [J].
Chakraborty, C ;
Chakraborty, D .
MATHEMATICAL AND COMPUTER MODELLING, 2006, 43 (3-4) :254-261
[5]   A decision scheme based on OWA operator for an evaluation programme: an approximate reasoning approach [J].
Chakraborty, C ;
Chakraborty, D .
APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2004, 5 (01) :45-53
[6]   Structural quantization of vagueness in linguistic expert opinions in an evaluation programme [J].
Chakraborty, D .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 2001, 119 (01) :171-186
[7]   Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment [J].
Chen, CT .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 2000, 114 (01) :1-9
[8]   Evaluating the best main battle tank using fuzzy decision theory with linguistic criteria evaluation [J].
Cheng, CH ;
Lin, Y .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2002, 142 (01) :174-186
[9]   A new approach for ranking fuzzy numbers by distance method [J].
Cheng, CH .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1998, 95 (03) :307-317
[10]   A similarity-based bidirectional approximate reasoning method for decision-making systems [J].
Chun, MG .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 2001, 117 (02) :269-278