Further important sensitizers in patients sensitive to fragrances -: II.: Reactivity to essential oils

被引:84
作者
Frosch, PJ
Johansen, JD
Menné, T
Pirker, C
Rastogi, SC
Andersen, KE
Bruze, M
Goossens, A
Lepoittevin, JP
White, IR
机构
[1] Univ Witten Herdecke, Dept Dermatol, D-44123 Dortmund, Germany
[2] Klinikum Dortmund gGmbH, Dept Dermatol, Dortmund, Germany
[3] Univ Copenhagen, Gentofte Hosp, DK-1168 Copenhagen, Denmark
[4] Natl Environm Res Inst, Dept Environm Chem, Roskilde, Denmark
[5] Odense Univ Hosp, Dept Dermatol, Odense, Denmark
[6] Univ Hosp, Dept Occupat & Environm Dermatol, Malmo, Sweden
[7] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Louvain, Belgium
[8] Univ Strasbourg, Lab Dermatochim, Strasbourg, France
[9] St Thomas Hosp, St Johns Inst Dermatol, London, England
关键词
contact allergy; essential oils; fragrance mix; fragrances; history of fragrance sensitivity; patch testing;
D O I
10.1034/j.1600-0536.2002.470204.x
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
In order to find sensitizers additional to the current fragrance mix (FM) a series of fragrance materials (series II) was evaluated in 6 dermatological centres in Europe. 11 of the test materials were essential oils, the remaining 7 being either mixtures of isomers or simple chemicals of frequent usage in the perfume industry. 1606 patients were consecutively tested with series II and 8% FM. Each patient was classified regarding a history of adverse reactions to scented products: certain, probable, questionable, none. Reactions to FM occurred most frequently in 11.4% of the subjects. The 6 materials with the highest reactivity after the FM were ylang-ylang oil (YY) I (2.6%), YY II (2.5%), lemongrass oil (1.6%), narcissus absolute (1.3%), jasmine absolute (1.2%) and sandalwood oil (0.9%). 48 (3.0%) of the patients reacted only to materials of series II and not to FM. 6.0% of 1606 patients gave a history of adverse reactions to fragrances which was classified as certain. This group reacted to FM only in 22.9%, to series II and FM in 15.6% and to series II only in 5.2%. 63.5% of the patients reacting to both FM and 1 of the materials of series II had some type of positive fragrance history, which was higher in comparison to those with isolated reactions to FM (46.2% of 121) or to series II, respectively, (45.8% of 48). However, this difference was not statistically significant. In conclusion, the materials of series II identified a further subset of patients with a fragrance problem, which would have been missed by the current FM as the single screening tool for patch testing.
引用
收藏
页码:279 / 287
页数:9
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]   A 5-YEAR STUDY OF COSMETIC REACTIONS [J].
ADAMS, RM ;
MAIBACH, HI .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 1985, 13 (06) :1062-1069
[2]   The time-dose-response relationship for elicitation of contact dermatitis in isoeugenol allergic individuals [J].
Andersen, KE ;
Johansen, JD ;
Bruze, M ;
Frosch, PJ ;
Goossens, A ;
Lepoittevin, JP ;
Rastogi, S ;
White, I ;
Menné, T .
TOXICOLOGY AND APPLIED PHARMACOLOGY, 2001, 170 (03) :166-171
[3]  
BAUER K, 1990, COMMON FRAGRANCE FLA, P181
[4]  
Brites MM, 2000, CONTACT DERMATITIS, V43, P181
[5]   STRUCTURES OF TWO ALKALOIDS FROM PATCHOULI OIL [J].
BUCHI, G ;
GOLDMAN, IM ;
MAYO, DW .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1966, 88 (13) :3109-&
[6]  
CALNAN C D, 1972, Transactions of the St. John's Hospital Dermatological Society, V58, P43
[7]  
De Groot A.C., 1994, UNWANTED EFFECTS COS
[8]   Adverse reactions to fragrances - A clinical review [J].
DeGroot, AC ;
Frosch, PJ .
CONTACT DERMATITIS, 1997, 36 (02) :57-86
[9]   PHOTOALLERGIC CONTACT-DERMATITIS - RESULTS OF PHOTOPATCH TESTING IN NEW-YORK, 1985 TO 1990 [J].
DELEO, VA ;
SUAREZ, SM ;
MASO, MJ .
ARCHIVES OF DERMATOLOGY, 1992, 128 (11) :1513-1518
[10]   TESTING WITH FRAGRANCE MIX - IS THE ADDITION OF SORBITAN SESQUIOLEATE TO THE CONSTITUENTS USEFUL - RESULTS OF A MULTICENTER TRIAL OF THE EUROPEAN ENVIRONMENTAL AND CONTACT-DERMATITIS RESEARCH GROUP (EECDRG) [J].
FROSCH, PJ ;
PILZ, B ;
BURROWS, D ;
CAMARASA, JG ;
LACHAPELLE, JM ;
LAHTI, A ;
MENNE, T ;
WILKINSON, JD .
CONTACT DERMATITIS, 1995, 32 (05) :266-272