Response to Intervention: Preventing and Remediating Academic Difficulties

被引:228
作者
Fletcher, Jack M. [1 ]
Vaughn, Sharon [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Houston, Dept Psychol, Houston, TX 77204 USA
[2] Univ Texas Austin, Austin, TX 78712 USA
关键词
learning disabilities; response to intervention; reading; IDEA; CURRICULUM-BASED MEASUREMENT; LEARNING-DISABILITIES; READING DISABILITIES; STUDENT-ACHIEVEMENT; DISCREPANCY DEFINITION; SPECIAL-EDUCATION; INSTRUCTION; IDENTIFICATION; CHILDREN; IQ;
D O I
10.1111/j.1750-8606.2008.00072.x
中图分类号
B844 [发展心理学(人类心理学)];
学科分类号
040202 ;
摘要
This article addresses the advantages and challenges of service delivery models based on student response to intervention (RTI) for preventing and remediating academic difficulties and as data sources for identification for special education services. The primary goal of RTI models is improved academic and behavioral outcomes for all students. The evidence is reviewed for the processes underlying RTI, including screening and progress monitoring assessments, evidence-based interventions, and schoolwide coordination of multitiered instruction. We also discuss the secondary goal of RTI, which is to provide data for identification of learning disabilities (LDs). Incorporating instructional response into identification represents a controversial shift away from discrepancies in cognitive skills that have traditionally been a primary basis for LD identification. RTI processes potentially integrate general and special education and suggest new directions for research and public policy related to LDs, but the scaling issues in schools are significant and more research is needed on the use of RTI data for identification.
引用
收藏
页码:30 / 37
页数:8
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2007, HDB RESPONSE INTERVE
[2]  
BAKER S, 2002, ELEMENTARY SCH J, V103, P336
[3]  
Bentum K.E., 2003, Reading Psychology, V24, P361, DOI DOI 10.1080/02702710390227387
[4]   Comparison of three approaches to supplementary reading instruction for low-achieving second-grade readers [J].
Berninger, VW ;
Vermeulen, K ;
Abbott, RD ;
McCutchen, D ;
Cotton, S ;
Cude, J ;
Dorn, S ;
Sharon, T .
LANGUAGE SPEECH AND HEARING SERVICES IN SCHOOLS, 2003, 34 (02) :101-116
[5]  
Bradley R., 2002, Identification of learning disabilities: Research to practice
[6]   Meta-analytic review of responsiveness-to-intervention research: Examining field-based and research-implemented models [J].
Burns, MK ;
Appleton, JJ ;
Stehouwer, JD .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOEDUCATIONAL ASSESSMENT, 2005, 23 (04) :381-394
[7]   An evaluation of intensive intervention for students with persistent reading difficulties [J].
Denton, Carolyn A. ;
Fletcher, Jack M. ;
Anthony, Jason L. ;
Francis, David J. .
JOURNAL OF LEARNING DISABILITIES, 2006, 39 (05) :447-466
[8]  
Donovan M.S., 2002, MINORITY STUDENTS SP, DOI 10.17226/10128
[9]  
Fletcher J. M., 2007, LEARNING DISABILITIE
[10]   Form effects on the estimation of students' oral reading fluency using DIBELS [J].
Francis, David J. ;
Santi, Kristi L. ;
Barr, Christopher ;
Fletcher, Jack M. ;
Varisco, Al ;
Foorman, Barbara R. .
JOURNAL OF SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 46 (03) :315-342