Source apportionment of visual impairment during the California regional PM10/PM2.5 air quality study

被引:11
作者
Chen, Jianjun [1 ]
Ying, Qi [2 ]
Kleeman, Michael J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[2] Texas A&M Univ, Zachry Dept Civil Engn, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
关键词
CRPAQS; Source apportionment; UCD/CIT air quality model; Visibility; AIRBORNE PARTICULATE MATTER; VISIBILITY; MODEL; AEROSOL; SENSITIVITY; SECONDARY; PARTICLE; VALLEY; RANGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.09.010
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Cases and particulate matter predictions from the UCD/CIT air quality model were used in a visibility model to predict source contributions to visual impairment in the San Joaquin Valley (SJV), the southern portion of California's Central Valley, during December 2000 and January 2001. Within the SJV, daytime (0800-1700 PST) light extinction was dominated by scattering associated with airborne particles. Measured daytime particle scattering coefficients were compared to predicted values at approximately 40 locations across the SJV after correction for the increased temperature and decreased relative humidity produced by "smart heaters" placed upstream of nephelometers. Mean fractional bias and mean fractional error were -0.22 and 0.65, respectively, indicating reasonable agreement between model predictions and measurements. Particulate water, nitrate, organic matter, and ammonium were the major particulate species contributing to light scattering in the SJV. Daytime light extinction in the SJV averaged between December 25. 2000 and January 7, 2001 was mainly associated with animal ammonia sources (28%), diesel engines (18%). catalyst gasoline engines (9%), other anthropogenic sources (9%). and wood smoke (7%) with initial and boundary conditions accounting for 13% The source apportionment results from this study apply to wintertime conditions when airborne particulate matter concentrations are typically at their annual maximum. Further study would be required to quantify source contributions to light extinction in other seasons. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved
引用
收藏
页码:6136 / 6144
页数:9
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2020, Gothenburg Protocol to reduce transboundary air pollution, DOI DOI 10.5860/CHOICE.44-4512
[2]   Modeling regional sulfate during the BRAVO study: Part 2. Emission sensitivity simulations and source apportionment [J].
Barna, MG ;
Schichtel, BA ;
Gebhart, KA ;
Malm, WC .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2006, 40 (14) :2423-2435
[3]  
Bohren C.F., 1998, Absorption and Scattering of Light by Small Particles
[4]   PM and light extinction model performance metrics, goals, and criteria for three-dimensional air quality models [J].
Boylan, James W. ;
Russell, Armistead G. .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2006, 40 (26) :4946-4959
[5]   A DETAILED MECHANISM FOR THE GAS-PHASE ATMOSPHERIC REACTIONS OF ORGANIC-COMPOUNDS [J].
CARTER, WPL .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT PART A-GENERAL TOPICS, 1990, 24 (03) :481-518
[6]   Source apportionment of visibility degradation problems in Brisbane (Australia) using the multiple linear regression techniques [J].
Chan, YC ;
Simpson, RW ;
Mctainsh, GH ;
Vowles, PD ;
Cohen, DD ;
Bailey, GM .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 1999, 33 (19) :3237-3250
[7]   PM2.5 chemical composition and spatiotemporal variability during the California Regional PM10/PM2.5 Air Quality Study (CRPAQS) [J].
Chow, Judith C. ;
Chen, L. -W. Antony ;
Watson, John G. ;
Lowenthal, Douglas H. ;
Magliano, Karen A. ;
Turkiewicz, Kasia ;
Lehrman, Donald E. .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2006, 111 (D10)
[8]  
*ENSR, 2005, CONTR CHEM CONST VIS
[9]   Distribution of continental surface aerosol extinction based on visual range data [J].
Husar, RB ;
Husar, JD ;
Martin, L .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2000, 34 (29-30) :5067-5078
[10]   Impaired visibility: the air pollution people see [J].
Hyslop, Nicole Pauly .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2009, 43 (01) :182-195