Quality indicators, including complications, of ERCP in a community setting: a prospective study

被引:144
作者
Colton, Joshua B. [1 ]
Curran, Colleen C. [2 ]
机构
[1] Minnesota Gastroenterol PA, St Paul, MN USA
[2] Univ Minnesota, Sch Publ Hlth, Div Biostat, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
关键词
RISK-FACTORS; THERAPEUTIC ERCP; PANCREATITIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.gie.2008.11.022
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
100201 [内科学];
摘要
Background: There are no large Studies documenting quality Outcomes and complication rates of ERCP in community practice. The American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE)/American College of Gastroenterology Task Force on Quality proposed 5 questions regarding ERCP in community practice. The ASGE Committee on Outcomes Research recommended 8 ERCP-specific quality indicators be used to provide a better accounting of quality in ERCP Objective: To determine ERCP quality outcomes, including complications, in a community practice. Design: Prospective study Setting: Eight community hospitals in the Minneapolis-St. Paul, Minnesota, area. Patients: Every patient undergoing ERCP by Minnesota Gastroenterology PA from December 1, 2005, through July 31, 2006. Main Outcome Measurements: ASGE-recommended quality indicators, especially 30-day complication rates. Results: A total of 805 ERCP procedures were performed in 696 patients. Therapeutic ERCP accounted for 78.4%. The complication rate was 5.0% (5.7% of therapeutic and 2.3% of diagnostic procedures). Pancreatitis occurred in 3.2% of procedures (3.6% of therapeutic and 1.7% of diagnostic procedures). Infection (0.75%.), hemorrhage (0.62%), and perforation (0.12%) only occurred after therapeutic ERCP Cardiopulmonary complications occurred in 2 patients (0.25%). Precut sphincterotomy was performed in 26 cases (3.2%), and sphincter of Oddi manometry in 23 cases (2.9%). Success rates were 94.0% for biliary cannulation, 87.0% for stone extraction, and 90.2% for relieving biliary obstruction. A total of 530 patient satisfaction surveys were completed and revealed that the response to the question, "Would You have the procedure done again by this physician?" was the most sensitive indicator of patient satisfaction. Conclusions: In this community practice, complication rates compare very favorably with those of academic centers. The technical success rates achieved or exceeded rates recommended by the ASGE/American College of Gastroenterology Task Force. (Gastrointest Endosc 2009;70:457-67.)
引用
收藏
页码:457 / 467
页数:11
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]
The clinical and cost impact of endoscopic ultrasound on ERCP in a tertiary referral center [J].
Alhayaf, Nassir ;
Lalor, Eoin ;
Mckaigney, John ;
Bain, Vince ;
Sandha, Gurpal .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2007, 65 (05) :AB297-AB297
[2]
American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 1999, ASGE PAT SAT SURV MO
[3]
Quality indicators for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography [J].
Baron, TH ;
Petersen, BT ;
Mergener, K ;
Chak, A ;
Cohen, J ;
Deal, SE ;
Hoffman, B ;
Jacobson, BC ;
Petrini, JL ;
Safdi, MA ;
Faigel, DO ;
Pike, IM .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2006, 63 (04) :S29-S34
[4]
CATALANO MF, 1996, GASTROINTEST ENDOSC, V43, pAB376
[5]
Gabexate for the prevention of pancreatic damage related to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography [J].
Cavallini, G ;
Tittobello, A ;
Frulloni, L ;
Masci, E ;
Mariani, A ;
DiFrancesco, V ;
Angelini, GP ;
Casarini, MB ;
Bedogni, G ;
Conigliaro, R ;
Bonardi, L ;
Khajekini, MTA ;
Cipolletta, L ;
Bianco, MA ;
Costamagna, G ;
Perri, V ;
Dobrilla, G ;
DePretis, G ;
Familiari, L ;
Giacobbe, G ;
Fratton, A ;
Carone, N ;
Loriga, P ;
Muscas, A ;
Mazzeo, F ;
Gaeta, L ;
Miglioli, M ;
Pezzilli, R ;
Morelli, A ;
Santucci, L ;
Naccarato, R ;
DelFavero, G ;
Orlandi, F ;
Macarri, GP ;
Russo, A ;
Virgilio, C ;
Uomo, G ;
Manes, G .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1996, 335 (13) :919-923
[6]
Complications of ERCP: a prospective study [J].
Christensen, M ;
Matzen, P ;
Schulze, S ;
Rosenberg, J .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2004, 60 (05) :721-731
[7]
Diagnostic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography [J].
Ciocirlan, M ;
Ponchon, T .
ENDOSCOPY, 2004, 36 (02) :137-146
[8]
ENDOSCOPIC SPHINCTEROTOMY COMPLICATIONS AND THEIR MANAGEMENT - AN ATTEMPT AT CONSENSUS [J].
COTTON, PB ;
LEHMAN, G ;
VENNES, J ;
GEENEN, JE ;
RUSSELL, RCG ;
MEYERS, WC ;
LIGUORY, C ;
NICKL, N .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1991, 37 (03) :383-393
[9]
Davies AR., 1991, GHAA's consumer satisfaction survey and user's manual
[10]
Freeman Martin L, 2002, Rev Gastroenterol Disord, V2, P147