As the Wind Blows? Understanding Hurricane Damages at the Local Level through a Case Study Analysis

被引:39
作者
Czajkowski, Jeffrey [1 ,2 ]
Done, James [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Wharton Risk Management & Decis Proc Ctr, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Willis Res Network, London, England
[3] Natl Ctr Atmospher Res, Earth Syst Lab, Boulder, CO 80307 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Damage assessment; Societal impacts; Insurance; Wind effects; Risk assessment; LOSSES; MODEL;
D O I
10.1175/WCAS-D-13-00024.1
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
An understanding of the potential drivers of local-scale hurricane losses is developed through a case study analysis. Two recent category-3 U.S. landfalling hurricanes (Ivan in 2004 and Dennis in 2005) are analyzed that, although similar in terms of maximum wind speed at their proximate coastal landfall locations, caused vastly different loss amounts. In contrast to existing studies that assess loss mostly at the relatively aggregate level, detailed local factors related to hazard, exposure, and vulnerability are identified. State-level raw wind insured loss data split by personal, commercial, and auto business lines are downscaled to the census tract level using the wind field. At this scale, losses are found to extend far inland and across business lines. Storm size is found to play an important role in explaining the different loss amounts by controlling not only the size of the impacted area but also the duration of damaging winds and the likelihood of large changes in wind direction. An empirical analysis of census tract losses provides further evidence for the importance of wind duration and wind directional change in addition to wind speed. The importance of exposure values however is more sensitive to assumptions in how loss data are downscaled. Appropriate consideration of these local drivers of hurricane loss may improve historical loss assessments and may also act upscale to impact future projections of hurricane losses under climate and socioeconomic change.
引用
收藏
页码:202 / 217
页数:16
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Nat. Hazards Rev, DOI [10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2008)9:1(29), DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2008)9:1(29)]
[2]  
[Anonymous], OFFSH TECHN C HOUST
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2011, Stata statistical software: Release 12
[4]  
Blake E.S., 2007, NOAA TECHNICAL MEMOR
[5]   HAVE DISASTER LOSSES INCREASED DUE TO ANTHROPOGENIC CLIMATE CHANGE? [J].
Bouwer, Laurens M. .
BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2011, 92 (01) :39-+
[6]   US Hurricanes and Economic Damage: Extreme Value Perspective [J].
Chavas, Daniel ;
Yonekura, Emmi ;
Karamperidou, Christina ;
Cavanaugh, Nicholas ;
Serafin, Katherine .
NATURAL HAZARDS REVIEW, 2013, 14 (04) :237-246
[7]  
Collins D.J., 2001, MACROVALIDATION DATA
[8]   THE DETERMINANTS OF RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY DAMAGE CAUSED BY HURRICANE-ANDREW [J].
FRONSTIN, P ;
HOLTMANN, AG .
SOUTHERN ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 1994, 61 (02) :387-397
[9]   WHEN DO LOSSES COUNT? Six Fallacies of Natural Hazards Loss Data [J].
Gall, Melanie ;
Borden, Kevin A. ;
Cutter, Susan L. .
BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2009, 90 (06) :799-+
[10]  
Guha-Sapir Debby., 2002, The Quality and Accuracy of Disaster Data: A Comparative Analyses of Three Global Data Sets