Trends in laparoscopic splenectomy for massive splenomegaly

被引:85
作者
Grahn, Sarah W. [1 ]
Alvarez, Jesus, III [1 ]
Kirkwood, Kimberly [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Surg, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1001/archsurg.141.8.755
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Hypothesis: During the past 10 years, expertise with minimally invasive techniques has grown, leading to an increase in successful laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) even in the setting of massive and supramassive spleens. Design: Retrospective series of patients who underwent splenectomy from November 1, 1995, to August 3 1, 2005. Setting: Academic tertiary care center. Patients: Adult patients who underwent elective splenectomy as their primary procedure (n = 111). Main Outcome Measures: Demographics, spleen size and weight, conversion from LS to open splenectomy, postoperative length of stay, and perioperative complications and mortality. Massive splenomegaly was defined as the spleen having a craniocaudal length greater than 17 cm or weight more than 600 g, and supramassive splenomegaly was defined as the spleen having a craniocaudal length greater than 22 cm or weight more than 1600 g. Results: Eighty-five (77%) of the 111 patients underwent LS. Of these 85 patients, 25 (29%) had massive or supramassive spleens. These accounted for 40% of LSs performed in 2004 and 50% in 2005. Despite this increase in giant spleens, the conversion rate for massive or supramassive spleens has declined from 33% prior to 1999 to 0% in 2004 and 2005. Since January 2004 at our institution, all of the massive or supramassive spleens have been removed with a laparoscopic approach. Patients with massive or supramassive spleens who underwent LS had no reoperations for bleeding or deaths and had a significantly shorter postoperative length of stay (mean postoperative length of stay, 3.8 days for patients who underwent LS vs 9.0 days for patients who underwent open splenectomy-, P <.001). Conclusions: Despite conflicting reports regarding the safety of LS for massive splenomegaly, our data indicate that with increasing institutional experience, the laparoscopic approach is safe, shortens the length of stay, and improves mortality.
引用
收藏
页码:755 / 761
页数:7
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   Experience with seven cases of massive splenomegaly [J].
Choy, C ;
Cacchione, R ;
Moon, V ;
Ferzli, G .
JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES-PART A, 2004, 14 (04) :197-200
[2]   LAPAROSCOPIC SPLENECTOMY [J].
DELAITRE, B ;
MAIGNIEN, B ;
ICARD, P .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1992, 79 (12) :1334-1334
[3]   Laparoscopic or open splenectomy for hematologic disease: Which approach is superior? [J].
Friedman, RL ;
Hiatt, JR ;
Korman, JL ;
Facklis, K ;
Cymerman, J ;
Phillips, EH .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 1997, 185 (01) :49-54
[4]   Laparoscopic splenectomy - The emerging standard [J].
Glasgow, RE ;
Yee, LF ;
Mulvihill, SJ .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY-ULTRASOUND AND INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 1997, 11 (02) :108-112
[5]  
Heniford BT, 2001, AM SURGEON, V67, P854
[6]   Laparoscopic splenectomy for massive splenomegaly [J].
Kercher, KW ;
Matthews, BD ;
Walsh, RM ;
Sing, RF ;
Backus, CL ;
Heniford, BT .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2002, 183 (02) :192-196
[7]   Analysis of risk factors for massive intraoperative bleeding during laparoscopic splenectomy [J].
Ohta, M ;
Nishizaki, T ;
Matsumoto, T ;
Shimabukuro, R ;
Sasaki, A ;
Shibata, K ;
Matsusaka, T ;
Kitano, S .
JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SURGERY, 2005, 12 (06) :433-437
[8]   Laparoscopic vs open splenectomy [J].
Park, A ;
Marcaccio, M ;
Sternbach, M ;
Witzke, D ;
Fitzgerald, P .
ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 1999, 134 (11) :1263-1269
[9]   Massive splenomegaly is associated with significant morbidity after laparoscopic splenectomy [J].
Patel, AG ;
Parker, JE ;
Wallwork, B ;
Kau, KB ;
Donaldson, N ;
Rhodes, MR ;
O'Rourke, N ;
Nathanson, L ;
Fielding, G .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2003, 238 (02) :235-240
[10]  
Poulin EC, 1998, CAN J SURG, V41, P28