Meta-information concepts for ecological data management

被引:110
作者
Michener, William K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ New Mexico, Dept Biol, Albuquerque, NM 87131 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.ecoinf.2005.08.004
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Ecological databases continue to grow in volume, breadth and complexity. Higher level descriptions of data (i.e., metadata) and information derived from subsequent data processing and analyses (i.e., "meta-information" in the broadest sense) are essential for understanding and using the increasingly complex and voluminous data and information. The concepts of meta-information, in general, and metadata, in particular, have evolved in concert with the increasing needs for functionality by the community. From a scientific perspective, metadata may be characterized as having developed from initially supporting data discovery; to facilitating acquisition, comprehension and utilization of data by humans; and, most recently, to beginning to enable automated data discovery, ingestion, processing and analysis via metadata-enabled scientific workflow systems. The continued conceptual and operational developments in metadata required to support comprehensive automated scientific workflow systems portend many challenges and opportunities. For example, there are significant opportunities for collaboration among ecologists and computer scientists in developing domain-specific controlled vocabularies and ontologies that provide the basis for semantic mediation-the "glue" technologies that enable automated data discovery, ingestion, processing and analysis. Similarly, there are opportunities for computer scientists and engineers to develop new mechanisms that support automated metadata encoding-such as providing the information that would be necessary to understand the end-to-end flow of sensor data from in situ data collection, streaming through quality assurance filtering, aggregation, transformation and additional processing, analysis, and publication of digital products. As the technologies mature, we still have many sociological barriers to overcome including the needs for increased attention to software usability testing and engineering to enhance user-friendliness of metadata management software, new capital investments in ecological data archives, and increasing the metadata management benefit-cost ratio for the average scientist via incentives and enabling tools. (c) 2005 Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 7
页数:5
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2000, ECOLOGICAL DATA DESI
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1994, Environmental Information Management and Analysis: Ecosystem to Global Scales
[3]  
CALLAHAN S, 1996, P 1 IEEE MET C IEEE
[4]  
Cook R.B., 2000, B ECOL SOC AM, V82, P138
[5]  
*FED GEOGR DAT COM, 1994, CONT STAND DIG GEOSP
[6]  
Federal Geographic Data Committee, 1999, FGDCSTD00111999 USGS
[7]  
Federal Geographic Data Committee, 2013, FGDCSTD0011998
[8]  
Fegraus E. H., 2005, Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America, V86, P158, DOI [DOI 10.1890/0012-9623(2005)86[158:MTVOED]2.0.CO
[9]  
2, DOI 10.1890/0012-9623(2005)86[158]
[10]  
FRONDORF A, 1999, P 3 IEEE COMP SOC ME